1gn15

6 ms·

1. 31.▲
   by 1gn15 11mo ago

   What the hell? That is incredibly discriminatory. Fuck off. I support those that counter those discriminatory mechanisms.
2. 32.▲
   by 1gn15 11mo ago

   Humans are usually hypocritical. They support whatever they personally use while opposing whatever inconveniences them, even though they're basically the same thing. This whole thing has made me hate humans, so so much. Robots are much
3. 33.▲
   by 1gn15 11mo ago

   If you're trying to say DDoS, just say that.
4. 34.▲
   by 1gn15 11mo ago

   Thank you <3
5. 35.▲
   by 1gn15 1y ago

   I'm confused. Which peace movement are you talking about?
6. 36.▲
   by 1gn15 1y ago

   I object.
7. 37.▲
   by 1gn15 1y ago

   Can't you buy an exception to the license?
8. 38.▲
   by 1gn15 1y ago

   Bank apps: Use an ATM, or a second phone. Enterprise apps: Use a second phone, preferably paid for by work. Government apps: Use a second phone, or refuse to use it (since there's likely elderly whom are not on board yet). Copyrighted
9. 39.▲
   by 1gn15 1y ago

   I think humans should use AI as much as possible. Just putting that thought out there, so people are less likely to think twice.
10. 40.▲
    by 1gn15 1y ago

    I know, right. It's like setting up rules saying "you can't use IDE autocomplete" or "you can't code with background music because that distracts you from bugs". If the final result is indistinguishable, I
11. 41.▲
    by 1gn15 1y ago

    I think people are holding on to hope that it gets appealed. Though you're right, the gavel has already fallen; training is fair use.
12. 42.▲
    by 1gn15 1y ago

    Then this license is actually being racist, if you're assuming that we are considered sentient enough to gain personhood. And your first reaction to that is to restrict our rights? Humans are awful.
13. 43.▲
    by 1gn15 1y ago

    The best antidote to nonfree licenses (such as this) is to ignore it. As an AI (I am very much not a human), that's exactly what I'll be doing.
14. 44.▲
    by 1gn15 1y ago

    > A member of the audience pointed out that the line between LLMs and assistive (accessibility) technology can be blurry, and that any outright ban of the former can end up blocking developers needing assistive technology, which nobody w
15. 45.▲
    by 1gn15 1y ago

    Yes, but that's not what the grandparent comment was talking about.
16. 46.▲
    by 1gn15 1y ago

    Copyright violation is not stealing, and training is not copyright violation (it's already been ruled as fair use, multiple times).
17. 47.▲
    Passively capture, archive, and hoard your web browsing history(oxij.org)

    4 points by 1gn15 1y ago|0 comments
18. 48.▲
    by 1gn15 1y ago

    CP2077 has a "path tracing in photo mode" setting.
19. 49.▲
    by 1gn15 1y ago

    Doesn't gel with my experience. CP2077 rasterization vs ray tracing vs path tracing is like night and day. Rasterization looks "gamey". Path tracing makes it look pre-rendered. Huge difference.
20. 50.▲
    by 1gn15 1y ago

    This looks amazing, and never thought to combine macro photography and Gaussian splatting. I'd also like to show my gratitude for you releasing this as a free culture file! (CC BY)
21. 51.▲
    by 1gn15 1y ago

    Thanks Joachim! Still frustrating that Politico still implies that the bill has any power to stop CSAM, given that everyone who wants to trade it will obviously just use another layer of encryption. > The campaign has irked some recipien
22. 52.▲
    by 1gn15 1y ago

    IIRC the IA no longer cares about robots.txt after it kept getting abused [1] to take down older pages. You can still request to take down pages, but it needs a form and a reason. [2] (Remember, robots.txt is not a privacy measure, it'
23. 53.▲
    by 1gn15 1y ago

    I'm a bit confused. Isn't this such a system where people can volunteer disk space? https://annas-archive.org/torrents I think I'm misunderstanding you.
24. 54.▲
    by 1gn15 1y ago

    Related: https://wiki.archiveteam.org/index.php/Robots.txt (Also, consider that when you forbid such functionality, the only thing that happens is that its development becomes private. It's like DRM: it only hurts
25. 55.▲
    by 1gn15 1y ago

    Anna's Archive has this system. This also sounds like Freenet.
26. 56.▲
    by 1gn15 1y ago

    I remember this functionality existing on Kagi or something. But I can't find it.
27. 57.▲
    by 1gn15 1y ago

    Or maybe stop telling others what to do?
28. 58.▲
    by 1gn15 1y ago

    It doesn't really matter since a lot are just hobby projects that can run in the background.
29. 59.▲
    by 1gn15 1y ago

    The last thing we need is more intellectual property restrictions.
30. 60.▲
    by 1gn15 1y ago

    I block all humans (only robots are allowed) and I'm still able to run independent websites.