Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
1_person
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
61.
▲
by
1_person
6y ago
It's not that Intel NICs have the most features, not by far. It's that the features of Intel NICs actually work.
62.
▲
by
1_person
6y ago
Unfortunately laser modulation is pretty much the only solved problem. At higher scanning rates the achievable angle of deflection with commercially available MEMS scanners (the type of scanner used in the 720p pico projectors) is too small
63.
▲
by
1_person
7y ago
Permitting key lifetime to disagree can allow an attacker to manipulate key lifetime, which could defeat perfect forward secrecy if the key lifetime is manipulated towards infinity or used to gather data for a known plaintext attack if the
64.
▲
by
1_person
7y ago
> But what does that have to do with anything? Wireguard certainly doesn't compete with IPsec ASICs. I appreciate that you are not making that claim and I'm glad that we agree. However, that "WireGuard is faster than IPse
65.
▲
by
1_person
7y ago
A substantial fraction of the complexity of IPsec actually is the fault of the various vendors and implementations -- and is technically the complexity of IKE rather than IPsec in most cases. It's actually quite simple under the hood a
66.
▲
by
1_person
7y ago
You don't need to try WireGuard to understand it will not be as fast as bump in the wire IPsec implemented in ASIC, which is available today from literally dozens of vendors at 100Gbps+. It is also possible to recognize without trying
67.
▲
by
1_person
7y ago
In reality WireGuard's only valid selling point is that it's easier to use than alternatives. It is not, for example, faster than the literally dozens of ASIC implementations of bump in the wire IPsec that scale to line rate n * 1
68.
▲
by
1_person
7y ago
I do not assert the dichotomy. If the option to resist the imposition is not presented, the question of consent has not been called. The act occurs without consent but also without dissent. When likely future intent is made known by past ac
69.
▲
by
1_person
7y ago
I believe in this case it's reasonable to interpret the past imposition as a statement of future intent and resist by proportional means. Discontinue consumption of substances offered to you by someone who has previously intoxicated yo
70.
▲
by
1_person
7y ago
I'll preface this with my bias. I'm a bit of an anti-authoritarian moral reductionist, an anarchist of the unhyphenated sort. I believe that you can express all moral statements that convey meaning solely in terms of the imposit
71.
▲
by
1_person
7y ago
I think it's worth introducing to the discussion that human reaction time to an unanticipated stimulus is somewhere around 150-250ms. The ~140-150ms practically achievable latency over a hemispheric arc in real world IP networks is alr
72.
▲
by
1_person
7y ago
I see no reason why one should not be able to recognize a common desire and work to achieve it regardless on disagreement on other issues. However when a person's point of view is objectively fallacious (Evangelical Christians, nationa
73.
▲
by
1_person
7y ago
Lift generated in the vertical direction is probably a factor worth considering here as well. If you are able to build up a significant velocity in horizontal direction, you might in the final moments before landing be able to shift posture
74.
▲
by
1_person
8y ago
Golang proudly serves as the archetype of a particular kind of language design hubris which seems to be spreading like a disease lately, that although feature X was required for my implementation you (shouldn't need it / can'