1_over_n

13 ms·

61.
by 1_over_n 7y ago
It's not logical or scientific right now.
62.
by 1_over_n 7y ago
I would say at best this is currently unclear, so no it is'nt "99% safe" (depending on your definition of safe) because: 1. It's possible the strains could mutate so they are different enough for the immune system to not
63.
by 1_over_n 7y ago
More info on proposed approach here - it is an mRNA "firebreak" vaccine https://spectrum.ieee.org/the-human-os/biomedical/bionics/da...
64.
Researchers test Covid-19 vaccine in people before knowing it works in animals(statnews.com)
2 points by 1_over_n 7y ago|1 comments
65.
British Society for Immunology open letter to Government on SARS-CoV-2 response(immunology.org)
137 points by 1_over_n 7y ago|151 comments
66.
by 1_over_n 7y ago
https://www.immunology.org/news/bsi-open-letter-government-s... The British Society for Immunology have also wrote an open letter of concern. They are immunologists and know about immunity.
67.
by 1_over_n 7y ago
and much denser populations, with a lot of international travel. which have a huge culture of eating food in hawker centres which would really seem to make a big threat to containment yet they appear to be doing well.
68.
Guns versus Butter Model Wiki(en.wikipedia.org)
3 points by 1_over_n 7y ago|0 comments
69.
by 1_over_n 7y ago
similar claim made in another paper posted a few days ago https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.11786
70.
Putting an End to End-to-End: Gradient-Isolated Learning of Representations(arxiv.org)
2 points by 1_over_n 7y ago|0 comments
71.
by 1_over_n 7y ago
This defaults to the assumption we are still talking about computing / programming skills and domain knowledge related to that. As another poster mentioned, do you think you would be constantly headhunted if you had a very narrow skill
72.
by 1_over_n 7y ago
Of all the possible HN users out there, stating there is no way of assessing the credibility of this research is quite a big statement. The point of journal articles is that the methods and data can be evaluated. Hopefully, someone with exp
73.
by 1_over_n 7y ago
Sorry, i posted the link and the full title was too long to fit in the field. I did editorialize it as the intention was to draw attention to the claim. Noted for future posts. Edited to include claim in journal below: "This suggests t
74.
Decoding evolution and transmissions of novel pneumonia coronavirus(researchgate.net)
99 points by 1_over_n 7y ago|55 comments
75.
Wiki Holobiont(en.wikipedia.org)
2 points by 1_over_n 7y ago|0 comments
76.
Pirate Code Wiki(en.wikipedia.org)
2 points by 1_over_n 7y ago|0 comments
77.
by 1_over_n 7y ago
All hail Jeremy et al. A leader and a legend.
78.
Gut microbiome composition and diversity relate to human personality traits(sciencedirect.com)
2 points by 1_over_n 7y ago|0 comments
79.
by 1_over_n 7y ago
Toad licking is also a thing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colorado_River_toad#Entheogeni...
80.
by 1_over_n 7y ago
it would be interesting to know if anyone has compared activity in visual cortex in schizophrenics having auditory vs visual vs olfactory vs tactile hallucinations to controls. A quick search shows "hyperconnectivity" has been fou
81.
by 1_over_n 7y ago
The current claim in the media is that intermediate hosts are the vector for the virus. It is clear from published research an intermediate vector is not required. These are all peer reviewed journals. There are no links to twitter / y
82.
by 1_over_n 7y ago
Ironically researchers from the Wuhan Institute of Virology demonstrated in 2013 "intermediate hosts may not be necessary for direct human infection by some bat like corona viruses" https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc
83.
by 1_over_n 7y ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22130806 Discussed in another thread last wek
84.
Elsevie free health and medical research papers on novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV)(elsevier.com)
1 points by 1_over_n 7y ago|0 comments
85.
by 1_over_n 7y ago
My comment was not a personal attack or even directed at you per se (sorry if it appeared that way). I do still feel that your level of exertise is in the minority of people browsing HN and it is also a valued contribution. I have experienc
86.
by 1_over_n 7y ago
mentioned in another post here https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22130806
87.
by 1_over_n 7y ago
+1 if you can find this ?
88.
by 1_over_n 7y ago
How many people commenting on here have actually worked in a lab doing this kind of research? or any lab for that matter? From experience, i will say that researchers are humans too and make mistakes. Things get dropped, spilled, mislablled
89.
by 1_over_n 7y ago
From what I can see this is the single highest grade viral research facility in the whole of china. There isn’t another with the same status.
90.
by 1_over_n 7y ago
This is a great idea, lovely to see something with so much potential utility being turned into a functional product.

More ›