15155

10 ms·

211.
by 15155 5mo ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAMM_(memory_module)
212.
by 15155 5mo ago
Even if it did, the Windows version is vastly inferior to the Linux version with regards to multithreading and other capabilities.
213.
by 15155 5mo ago
FFTs are found in every nook and cranny of modern communications and computing.
214.
by 15155 5mo ago
Independent tire shops without known brands and/or racing-oriented stores.
215.
by 15155 5mo ago
Because local models exist and you can't take them away. Drugs are banned, they still exist. Many torrents flourish (that violate copyright laws), humans can't seem to stop those. Generative AI has too much commercial utility to e
216.
by 15155 5mo ago
People will just become numb to images and video and trust nothing: this is already happening.
217.
by 15155 5mo ago
The genie has been out of the bottle for 100 years, it's delusional to think that some voluntary watermark is going to stop that. In reality, all images will cease to be trustworthy and there's nothing that can be done about this.
218.
by 15155 5mo ago
Stalin had no issues photoshopping images almost 100 years ago.
219.
by 15155 5mo ago
Because while this is 100% a thing and anyone who has taken a vehicle to the track knows this, Les Schwab or Discount Tire aren't doing this for you.
220.
by 15155 5mo ago
https://improbable.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Pseudoephe...
221.
by 15155 5mo ago
> insanely ineffective banning pseudoephedrine Limiting pseudoephedrine need not have effect on overall quantity to have huge positive societal effects. More P2P in industrial laboratories means less DIY Birch reductions in a soda bottle
222.
by 15155 5mo ago
US Attorneys aren't forced to toe the party line on every issue. This issue is just not directly politically important enough to get the "don't touch" treatment. Donors and party power brokers aren't rolling coal.
223.
by 15155 5mo ago
> concentrated in Taiwan Where are SK Hynix and Samsung located again? Or 95% of Micron's facilities?
224.
by 15155 5mo ago
Which means the controversy in question would not apply to you whatsoever.
225.
by 15155 5mo ago
"Press charges" - as if this were some Simple Assault. The CFAA isn't something one "chooses" to levy or not, these are crimes against the United States of America and it is solely up to the discretion of a US Attor
226.
by 15155 5mo ago
> no possibility of any of these. Except, you know, a UART? https://ratcloud.llc/
227.
by 15155 5mo ago
The law isn't some autistic computer system, "authentication" is a very broad and amorphous term.
228.
by 15155 5mo ago
The technology isn't reliable enough (yet, possibly ever?) for this to be the case, and the moment this happens a replacement control board will be created.
229.
by 15155 5mo ago
The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act is your friend. Furthermore, the idea that you could be expected to perform technical labor to repair something is ridiculous: grandma is protected, too, and this type of service falls far outside the scope of
230.
by 15155 5mo ago
Did you ever consider the idea that not everyone wants to live in the typical "urban" environment? Not having public transportation or high-density housing nearby is a feature and a desirable property. > I’d first need to loa
231.
by 15155 6mo ago
Only because they didn't know how to ask the vendor to do it for them. I guarantee this vendor would be delighted to make them to spec at a 1ku volume, max. Rewinding isn't even a meaningful SKU distinction or line retool, it&#x27
232.
by 15155 6mo ago
Which is why it was notoriously banned from exams.
233.
by 15155 6mo ago
That other fellow more or less cloned my comments after half an hour, I have no idea why. This doesn't make the underlying English analysis inaccurate: the prefatory clause does not somehow restrict the rest of the sentence. > You d
234.
by 15155 6mo ago
"Bullshit" - also known as: "settled jurisprudence I don't agree with."
235.
by 15155 6mo ago
But but but the Framers disagreed on whether or not to include the Bill of Rights at all! That must mean that they didn't think people should own arms!
236.
by 15155 6mo ago
And you still lose on the merits: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/246
237.
by 15155 6mo ago
FWIW: this isn't a universally-applicable statement, plenty of states forbid DWI during any and all operation of motor vehicles, including on private property.
238.
by 15155 6mo ago
Basic English skills? Why would the prefatory clause limit the latter? Even the most left-leaning [current] SCOTUS justices didn't/don't attempt to make this argument. 'A well balanced breakfast being necessary to the st
239.
by 15155 6mo ago
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/rule_of_lenity If one wants to make something illegal, the onus is on the lawmaker to write precise legislation. This is centuries-old legal doctrine.
240.
by 15155 6mo ago
"Absurd fiction" aka "established law for decades." This concept of "serialized part" is a construct stemming from Democrat-established legislation. What part of "shall not be infringed" is difficult

More ›