15155

19 ms·

481.
by 15155 10mo ago
I mean - no, they didn't, Ring existed long before Flock (but has since removed the police "request everything in the area" feature.) Flock just brought this to the public right-of-way.
482.
by 15155 10mo ago
> Private ships Often, the same people crying about Flock will decry private arms ownership through mental gymnastics. These very same ships you speak of that could do "tons of damage" had actual cannonry - with no registration
483.
by 15155 10mo ago
> constantly recording kids without adult consent Why do they need consent in a public place? Children vandalize, steal, etc. as well - should they just be immune from detection because they are below some arbitrary age? Do banks just sh
484.
by 15155 10mo ago
> highest grade FPGAs also have HBM memory The three SKUs between Xilinx and Altera that had HBM are no longer manufactured because Samsung Aquabolt was discontinued.
485.
by 15155 10mo ago
> and quite a bit worse than just dealing with an MCU. Unless you're using some kind of USB DFU mode (which is annoying on assembly lines), SWD-based flashing of an MCU is substantially more complicated than the JTAG sequences that
486.
by 15155 10mo ago
> they're complicated to put down on boards https://gowinsemi.com/en/product/detail/46/ - Requires just 1V2 + 3V3 - Available in QFN - Bitstream is saved in internal flash or programmed to SRAM v
487.
by 15155 10mo ago
3D printers and cheap CNC mills and lathes thankfully obviate all of these "laws."
488.
by 15155 10mo ago
Was this not posted five days ago with the same comments? Why are the times shifted?
489.
by 15155 10mo ago
Tortious interference with contract, cut and dry.
490.
by 15155 10mo ago
Or censorship avoidance
491.
by 15155 10mo ago
As far as I am aware, there's no Federal law prohibiting the publication of SSNs for lawful purposes (which is the typical default.) In Virginia, Ostergren v. Cuccinelli (4th Cir. 2010) touched on this very issue, and ultimately conc
492.
by 15155 10mo ago
Have you ever read any of the Federalist papers? This is extraordinarily ignorant - even left-leaning SCOTUS justices do not agree with you (see Caetano , etc.)
493.
by 15155 10mo ago
Is this supposed to be some kind of "gotcha?" I don't really care about the language being used to describe this law enforcement agency: it isn't going to change my opinion about their mission or somehow change their leg
494.
by 15155 10mo ago
"Years of their life back" - I'm confused: how does a mistaken arrest result in "years of life" being lost in an immigration enforcement snafu? You do realize that due process exists after an arrest?
495.
by 15155 10mo ago
> No, again that's easy enough to avoid. It's amusing that circumvention is your go-to: I watch my cameras almost every moment I'm awake, vandalizing a $1k+ item (a felony in my state) would be met with immediate armed res
496.
by 15155 10mo ago
My right to place cameras on my private property absolutely trumps your desire to not be seen or recorded (or whatever your specific grievance is) in the United States. This isn't about "hard rules" - make laws prohibiting go
497.
by 15155 10mo ago
> I’ve heard this argument in the context of capital punishment, and I find it incredibly unconvincing. This is more or less a false dichotomy. Capital punishment is by definition irreversible, so mistakes aren't tolerable. Being ar
498.
by 15155 10mo ago
> As an aside, if we cannot figure out a way to make this fit with the First Amendment as written today, we need to make updating that a priority already. The founders had no idea that we would end up with computers and cameras that coul
499.
by 15155 10mo ago
Of course you could vandalize them easily enough... and be seen doing so from multiple angles: ideally leading to your prosecution and imprisonment or possibly direct kinetic response from their owners. The legal system tends to react even
500.
by 15155 10mo ago
> You can't take pictures of the entire contents of a book and publish it. Copyright is "mostly" civil law, not criminal. > can't run into an airport and yell that you've got a bomb. Right: now try and argue t
501.
by 15155 10mo ago
> would suggest others consider what an evil leftist What are some things that could they do? Right-leaning policy in 2025 typically leans towards enforcing the laws as written: in this case, immigration law is being bolstered by surveil
502.
by 15155 10mo ago
Because these are human systems involving humans: there will always be mistakes. Advocating for the elimination of 100% of mistakes is a typical "rules for radicals" method of backdoor legislation through increased bureaucracy. I&
503.
by 15155 10mo ago
I don't disagree with you, but this is obviously a misleading stat on its face because the number of people has simply never been higher. Crime per capita could be completely static and this statement would always be true simply becaus
504.
by 15155 10mo ago
> I think small progressive and libertarian enclaves will get rid of their cameras while remaining landlocked in a sea of municipalities expanding theirs. Flock will just start putting cameras up on private property and selling the data
505.
by 15155 10mo ago
> decided that their main goal is finding arbitrary noncitizens to deport In the vast majority of cases this means: "enforcing immigration law." A presidential administration deeming it politically expedient to import illegal i
506.
by 15155 10mo ago
> Honestly makes me want to vandalise them (though I will not). Sounds like the cameras are working? Seems like a reason to put up more cameras: vandals can't take out any two as easily/simultaneously.
507.
by 15155 10mo ago
This is the United States of America: I'm allowed to report on the activity going on in public outside of my property, and you need to amend the Constitution if you'd like to legally prohibit that.
508.
by 15155 10mo ago
The ideal amount of mistakes is non-zero. We should compensate those who are improperly arrested and quickly correct these violations, attempt to prevent them in the future, reprimand those involved if necessary, but absolutely keep pushing
509.
by 15155 10mo ago
> addressing the selective application of the law to further conservative agendas Does selectively not enforcing immigration law further liberal agendas? - House seats (and therefore electoral votes) are determined by census - which in
510.
by 15155 10mo ago
> It says nothing directly about privacy, for or against Freedom of the press is directly related to privacy: if I can see something in public as a private citizen, I can report on it, and you may not create any laws abridging this. I&#x

More ›