123yawaworht456

25 ms·

331.
by 123yawaworht456 3y ago
there is a somewhat unfiltered GPT4 at Azure, but they really don't want anybody's money (afaik only "trusted" corporate entities can access it) at this time, your only option is local models. if you don't have
332.
by 123yawaworht456 3y ago
I wish this technology came into existence in mid 00's, before twitter-induced global brain rot
333.
by 123yawaworht456 3y ago
1. everyone seems to be under the assumption that generative AI will continue advance at rapid pace. this might very well not be the case. 2. writers and artists are very unlikely to be replaced by generative AI, because big corporate model
334.
by 123yawaworht456 3y ago
they don't, but AI is the current thing and they have to weight in.
335.
by 123yawaworht456 3y ago
a model without censorship and alignment is the opposite of 'magical'. openai/meta/anthropic/google spend a lot of time and money lobotomizing their models.
336.
by 123yawaworht456 3y ago
reddit: all technology I've been convinced to perceive as morally objectionable is ruining the environment and should be banned by the world government.
337.
by 123yawaworht456 3y ago
then you will simply see those jobs being moved/outsourced to the third world without regulations, just like virtually all manufacturing did. china, russia, india and a ton of other countries won't give a shit about 'global m
338.
by 123yawaworht456 3y ago
using this analogy, copyright holders want to sue the guitarist for having listened to "Stairway to Heaven"
339.
by 123yawaworht456 3y ago
github now engages in same bullshit that all big platform do with gaslighting/shadowbanning upon account creation. if it doesn't like you, for any reason or no reason at all, it doesn't actually prevent you from signing up, b
340.
by 123yawaworht456 3y ago
guys, don't hide your pricing and product information ("Learn More") behind a login wall.
341.
by 123yawaworht456 3y ago
because while individual researchers and other drones might believe in scifi skynet bullshit and/or have a set of beliefs about AI ethics they wish to impose upon others, the people who matter - the ones who pay their salaries and fund
342.
by 123yawaworht456 3y ago
it really is. it feels at the very least equal to llama2 13b. if mistral 70b had existed and was as much an improvement over llama2 70b as it is at 7b size, it would definitely be on part with gpt3.5
343.
by 123yawaworht456 3y ago
'you vill ovn nothing' went from being a conspiracy theory to reality remarkably quickly.
344.
by 123yawaworht456 3y ago
for the past decade or more, the bourgeoisie and bohemian types have cheered and sneered along the lines of "if your job can be taken away by an immigrant, you aren't good at it". well, now their jobs are going to be taken aw
345.
by 123yawaworht456 3y ago
friendly reminder that "AGI" was mentioned in regard to GPT2 as well.
346.
by 123yawaworht456 3y ago
BMW is doing that, and it's older than the Thousand-Year reich. this is not a consequence of VC, rather, it's evidence that slippery slope is law rather than fallacy.
347.
by 123yawaworht456 3y ago
what purpose does a LLM serve on a killing drone, exactly?
348.
by 123yawaworht456 3y ago
>No one is claiming todays tech poses and existential threat. really now, friend?
349.
by 123yawaworht456 3y ago
This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.
350.
by 123yawaworht456 3y ago
people who care about this kind of thing will simply cease to use those websites. I have never clicked on facebook/instagram links because of their login walls, I have ceased to click on twitter links since they've implemented the
351.
by 123yawaworht456 3y ago
>It’s easy to see how this kind of tool use comes with tremendous risks. Imagine an LLM being able to find someone’s phone number, call them and surreptitiously record their voice, guess what bank they use based on the largest providers
352.
by 123yawaworht456 3y ago
I mean "I am become death, destroyer of worlds" bullshit about AI safety/ethics/etc that is included in every press release from Google/Meta/OpenAI and even much smaller players.
353.
by 123yawaworht456 3y ago
I applaud you guys for not including any nauseating gibberish in this press release or seemingly anywhere else on your website. It's like a breath of fresh air comparing to every other AI-related resource I saw recently. Please, keep i
354.
by 123yawaworht456 3y ago
LLM = a person talking to a computer. censoring/moderating that is akin to censoring/moderating what you enter in Notepad, and I feel we are approaching the point where we will soon be having unironic arguments against general pur
355.
by 123yawaworht456 3y ago
no, we haven't. that's a view held by 0.00001% of the population in a handful of western countries
356.
by 123yawaworht456 3y ago
you can buy trivial amounts (10-100) in small packages with precise count. non-trivial amounts are sold by weight because no one is counting them. the approximate count per pound is usually specified.