100ms

5 ms·

31.
by 100ms 4mo ago
The video angle published by the BBC is better, it appears to show one side of the rocket disintegrating and sliding down non-explosively before the large explosion really kicked in. Would hate for this all to be described by a few missing
32.
by 100ms 4mo ago
Sustained pushback helps define how the tool is used, and if it only takes a few years of complaints to permanently establish good social norms around it, I think we're better for it. At least, I much prefer this than a world where eve
33.
by 100ms 4mo ago
I don't think any value would be lost in that case by simply deleting the text and not replacing it with anything. AI is particularly bad at inserting this kind of filler, it can sometimes be really hard to spot even though it's r
34.
by 100ms 4mo ago
Even if you've otherwise put in a lot of effort, presenting it with slop on the home page really sends a bad signal. My eye caught "No proprietary clients. No vendor lock-in." as an AI pattern and I'm immediately drawn t
35.
by 100ms 4mo ago
5x 400gbit running to a 2U box whoa, the PCI lanes must have heat shielding. More seriously there is a sensibility limit on extreme density where it's not needed. The idea that you're just going to magically get 2 TBit/s out
36.
by 100ms 5mo ago
And somehow I still feel worse off that Musk lost?
37.
by 100ms 5mo ago
Is there a version of ingress-nginx somewhere with a fix for this?
38.
by 100ms 5mo ago
Your approach looks interesting but I was curious when you talk about path-based splitting for ART, do you literally mean always on "/"? I know S3 directory buckets always use /, but the classical S3 model had no natura
39.
by 100ms 5mo ago
does refind support secure boot and measured boot? I loathe pretty much anything systemd but systemd-boot gives me this with zero effort, and it's legitimately useful
40.
by 100ms 5mo ago
Tinfoil looks super interesting! Do you have load balancers in front of the trusted compute stack? Looked at a design like this in a different space and the options for ensuring privacy in a traditional "best practice" architectur
41.
by 100ms 5mo ago
By the time the dust settles I wouldn't be surprised if personal interactive usage couldn't even be had for under $200. I can't fit my modelling of the serving costs of these things to any public reporting, even the more bear
42.
by 100ms 5mo ago
I dislike neg comments but really curious - I can see the how but absolutely clueless about the why. Running a block device over a high latency WAN link seems like a terrible idea, what's the use case?
43.
by 100ms 5mo ago
I don't really see reason to complain about tool use, so long as the result is cohesive, accurate and that ultimately means a human has at least read their own output before publishing. It's a bit like receiving a supposedly perso
44.
by 100ms 5mo ago
> Full stop. Why people don't edit out obvious sloppification and expect to still have readers left
45.
by 100ms 5mo ago
These seem amazing for hobbyist, but that TDP given the perf might be an issue deploying a lot of them
46.
A Year of Hetzner Auction Data: Where Did All the Servers Go?(blog.iodev.org)
4 points by 100ms 5mo ago|1 comments
47.
by 100ms 5mo ago
That's not an ideal tone for here. From my perspective the most incredible thing is the concentration of IO. I might like at some point for elements of my computer usage to remain private, it would be nice if that ability were preserve
48.
by 100ms 6mo ago
It's literally a distinct model with a different optimisation goal compared to normal chat. There's a ton of public information around how they work and how they're trained
49.
Ubuntu Rust Coreutils Audit Revealed 44 CVEs(phoronix.com)
8 points by 100ms 6mo ago|1 comments
50.
by 100ms 6mo ago
Unironically the best method to implement that browser feature you're looking for is probably also AI. Which tells a meta-story, AI isn't a new feature it's also a new medium. It can be used to turn cave speak into works of l
51.
by 100ms 6mo ago
He goes way beyond saying it's a test, he's legitimising the change in the follow-up rationale
52.
by 100ms 6mo ago
I'm excited for Taalas, but the worry with that suggestion is that it would blow out energy per net unit of work, which kills a lot of Taalas' buzz. Still, it's inevitable if you make something an order of magnitude faster, f
53.
by 100ms 6mo ago
What's the alternative? https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&editio...
54.
by 100ms 6mo ago
I originally switched to Opus because it could reliably write Rust. As of 2 weeks ago, I'm using Codex because it writes way more compact and idiomatic Rust. Just another anecdote for the pile. I detest ChatGPT's persona, but Code
55.
by 100ms 6mo ago
$ pbpaste | wc -w 62508 $ pbpaste | grep -oi mythos|wc -w 331 $ pbpaste | grep -oi opus|wc -w 809
56.
by 100ms 6mo ago
This is only a little billing leakage, Operation Aurora in 2009 was 100x worse
57.
by 100ms 6mo ago
Implementing this in any meaningful manner quickly begins to look like every read becoming a globally synchronised write. Of course it doesn't have to be perfect, but even approximating perfection doesn't look much different. Also
58.
by 100ms 6mo ago
GPT 3.5 Turbo knowledge cutoff was circa 2021. MT-Bench is from 2023. Not suggesting improvements on small models aren't possible (or forthcoming, the 1.85 bit etc models look exciting), but this almost certainly isn't that.
59.
by 100ms 6mo ago
Tiny model overfit on benchmark published 3 years prior to its training. News at 10
60.
by 100ms 6mo ago
I don't remember why I started doing it, but I don't bulk exclude .cache for some reason or other. I have a script that strips down larger known caches as part of the backup. But the logic, whatever it was, is easy to understand:

More ›