0xDEFC0DE

21 ms·

1. 181.▲
   by 0xDEFC0DE 8y ago

   That'd be in a contract though, so what if Google decided to not renew and only let Uber know like a month before the contract ended? If these questions seem dumb it's because I know pretty little about legal battles in software.
2. 182.▲
   by 0xDEFC0DE 8y ago

   I'm asking whether only Uber could be charged more.
3. 183.▲
   by 0xDEFC0DE 8y ago

   Not to defend Uber/NIH syndrome, but if Google wanted to specifically charge Uber more for maps because of usage, could they legally do that? Maybe the rewrites are risk management?
4. 184.▲
   by 0xDEFC0DE 8y ago

   Google was doing something like this: https://ai.googleblog.com/2018/03/using-machine-learning-to-...
5. 185.▲
   by 0xDEFC0DE 8y ago

   All respect to Aaron's memory, but it hasn't aged that well. There's an implicit trust in books for authority, but those have been used on both sides of the Trump press war for political reasons. News is how you find out the
6. 186.▲
   by 0xDEFC0DE 8y ago

   I've been seeing quite a few layoff posts since the new year. Is this just my own bias or has anyone noticed an uptick in massive layoff events?
7. 187.▲
   by 0xDEFC0DE 8y ago

   My only critique of this is that clinicians in the US may be under large organizational umbrellas and may be strongly encouraged (forced?) to go through apps chosen by the org, and so they aren't really making any conscious choices. (T
8. 188.▲
   by 0xDEFC0DE 8y ago

   Good twitter thread on this issue so far: https://twitter.com/GossiTheDog/status/1107928490580627456