0x457

108 ms·

961.
by 0x457 2y ago
Ignore this, I read "photon" as "proton"
962.
by 0x457 2y ago
Wait hold on, I'm a moron that read photon (the UI of QNX) as proton (valve thingy). Disregard my message.
963.
by 0x457 2y ago
> If grocery stores were like Netflix (or all streamers I think), every day, everything would have moved to different aisles because customers love having to spend ages finding the thing they came in looking for. What country are you fro
964.
by 0x457 2y ago
Well, if they used content not owned by Netflix, which they for sure did, some of it could have been licensed as "per-stream" or something similar; tl;dr; It's probably costing them more when people stream those titles, then
965.
by 0x457 2y ago
For starters, QNX has IPC that works over IP-capable networks, which makes things like High Availibility much easier to implement. Drivers are in user-land and can be restarted at runtime. Probably more, but it's been awhile since I us
966.
by 0x457 2y ago
I think this is more like introducing and RCE into your body, since CRISPR essentially modifies your executable code?
967.
by 0x457 2y ago
I wouldn't call it desktop-friendly. Yeah, you could install and develop for QNX on it, but that was pretty much all you could do on it? Definitely won't be playing any video games on it.
968.
by 0x457 2y ago
That's why I said it isn't meant for desktop [where you would play games via proton].
969.
by 0x457 2y ago
This isn't an OS meant for desktops.
970.
by 0x457 2y ago
Maybe not the brightest future, but it's more than just a POSIX OS.
971.
by 0x457 2y ago
Those are two different kinds of sandboxing. One protects application from itself - "here is what I use, if I try anything else, then it's a bug". Sandboxing you're talking about protects system from the application. You
972.
by 0x457 2y ago
Well, in every team-based PVP game one side has to lose (or a tie in sport games sometimes). This isn't even a match-fixing because while outcome is predicted, nothing beyond matching "weak" team against "strong" te
973.
by 0x457 2y ago
I think it's an (so-far) endless cycle of: - One decides that they want to use actors - Look for frameworks - find those that either abandoned or don't vibe with one - start your own - passion runs out for project that needed acto
974.
by 0x457 2y ago
Here is how it explained in the docs: https://docs.rs/ractor/latest/ractor/actor/index.html#actor-...
975.
by 0x457 2y ago
Use case is - you have car thing that spotify bricked by not supporting it, and now it's doing something useful.
976.
by 0x457 2y ago
Two things here: - clang and LLVM don't have that GCC quirk (LLVM support less platforms, so give gcc some credit) - it was in apple's financial interest make sure their things are easy to cross-compile. - linker job is extremely
977.
by 0x457 2y ago
It doesn't need (unless it does in some cases), but entire build process needs to be aware of what needs to be native and what doesn't. Mainly a lot of issue would come from linker. Yes, it's not part of the compilation techn
978.
by 0x457 2y ago
The download with unverified certificate only triggered on windows if there isn't "good enough" version of python installed. If it's already installed then nothing needs to be downloaded. Again, this vulnerability can&#x
979.
by 0x457 2y ago
I guess it's meant to be processed by some bundler later.
980.
by 0x457 2y ago
First of all those are linux boxes that not effected by this. Second, attacker here had a valid certificate, it was only noticed when certificate expired (so 6 months after, since it was LE cert). > Besides sketchy government-related ent
981.
by 0x457 2y ago
Well, WASM runs in a VM, not on a hardware? There isn't hardware that runs WASM directly (at least nothing serious, maybe some hobby FPGA or POC). So when you compiled to WASM you're going with route #1. WASM was designed with thi
982.
by 0x457 2y ago
If you're connecting to a rogue AP, then you are already lost.
983.
by 0x457 2y ago
> The "some access to the target" bit could just being on the same unsecure wifi network as them, such as a coffee shop or library. Fucking hell, how often do you use torrents in coffee shops let alone install new torrent clien
984.
by 0x457 2y ago
Yes, that's what I meant by other way requires _some_ access to the target.
985.
by 0x457 2y ago
Yes, I fucking love going to the coffee shop and airport, then proceed to download QBitTorrent do download some linux ISOs. Because those places always have highly reliable WiFi, high speed and definetly not filtering traffic.
986.
by 0x457 2y ago
By why does it matter? It's a one-way hash isn't? Also, we're talking about user_id not user_email, so it should be the same length always. Well, unless you're silly and using databases sequence for IDs.
987.
by 0x457 2y ago
I mean yes overall, but why would put delimeters into hash? you just smash bytes together.
988.
by 0x457 2y ago
Probably zero? That thing was reposible for downloading python from python.org. It's possible to exploit, but would need to be pretty targeted and would require already some access to the target[1]. [1]: Because only other way to explo
989.
by 0x457 2y ago
What about Paradox games? genuinely curious about that.
990.
by 0x457 2y ago
I remember when macOS switched to evented way of handling input and for some reason decided that dropping keyboard events is okay...anyway if spotlight was updating its index, then unlocking your laptop with a password was impossible.

More ›