0x3f

49 ms·

241.
by 0x3f 7mo ago
The pay levels seem more of an inherent problem than the political winds.
242.
by 0x3f 7mo ago
You do if you don't want your legal name in there, as I said.
243.
by 0x3f 7mo ago
If you sign an app your legal name gets embedded into the .app bundle. You can use e.g. `codesign` in the terminal to read it back, or if you publish to the App Store it will be in the UI, along with the others.
244.
by 0x3f 7mo ago
I haven't done it in a while, so didn't want to give out possibly wrong directions, but: > I don't know how obvious it is these days, but the default path through D&B's website is the terrible one. They will try t
245.
by 0x3f 7mo ago
I don't know how obvious it is these days, but the default path through D&B's website is the terrible one. They will try to extract money from you and harass you forever. You had to find Apple's own embedded form for it
246.
by 0x3f 7mo ago
Well, depends what the author's plans are for the future. Maybe it's not always going to be free as in beer, either.
247.
by 0x3f 7mo ago
Yes, everything should just be agnostic, as long as the incentives work out it's all fine. Like if we had worked out micropayments for the web (not saying that's a good idea per se), then who cares if you're a bot or a human
248.
by 0x3f 7mo ago
If you don't want your name, address, phone number on public display you need to either set up a company or set up some forwarding. If you set up a company, you'll need to get a DUNS number. If you haven't done it before an
249.
by 0x3f 7mo ago
Well it's the same answer isn't it... use Cloudflare. And hope OpenAI doesn't have a backroom scraping deal with them, which they might.
250.
by 0x3f 7mo ago
You can never prevent things like this, but you can make it expensive enough to effectively solve the problem for almost all use cases.
251.
by 0x3f 7mo ago
You can just decay your trust level based on the `iat` value. That way people will need to keep buying me coffee. I can optionally chide them for giving out their token. If you're engaging with the idea seriously, I suppose we'd
252.
by 0x3f 7mo ago
Four years is plenty of time to start launching. Also, MAD incentivizes disclosure. What would be the point of having secret nukes? Openly having them is the only way to stop the US using its nukes to stop your nuke program, in this sce
253.
by 0x3f 7mo ago
It's just Cloudflare. Bypassing it is a whole industry.
254.
by 0x3f 7mo ago
Meet me in a cafe and I will sign a JWT saying you're not a bot. You can submit this to whoever will accept it.
255.
by 0x3f 7mo ago
Depends on the context. We certainly knew nobody else had nukes.
256.
by 0x3f 7mo ago
Well if they're only an upstart, they don't have the ability to destroy you _yet_. You 'nuke' them in the hope they won't get that ability. You're aiming to stop MAD from being a thing. In those terms, the US
257.
by 0x3f 7mo ago
Competition kills margins (profits, security, QoL), so the budget for eradication should be quite high, but generally speaking the idea is to destroy even fledgling upstarts, back when the cost is low.
258.
by 0x3f 7mo ago
I'm not sure you've quite understood the conversation.
259.
by 0x3f 7mo ago
> Banks and fintech have dug their own grave Most of the annoying stuff with banks is just a response to government regulation.
260.
by 0x3f 7mo ago
It would probably do a lot of good if we taught kids the efficient-market hypothesis in high school, or something.
261.
by 0x3f 7mo ago
You don't mention any timeframes here relating to when the bulk of payments happened. It's quite reasonable for Stripe to hold what they see as high-risk funds in _anticipation_ of more disputes coming in.
262.
by 0x3f 7mo ago
If context is irrelevant then every country in Europe already separates families, and thus how can this be a complaint?
263.
by 0x3f 7mo ago
China's been behind too, but at least they're trying something.
264.
by 0x3f 7mo ago
It's quite odd how Europeans will see and describe themselves only in terms of being a US vassal.
265.
by 0x3f 7mo ago
> Not yet because they’re not operating in Europe yet. They're definitely operating in Europe. They literally have 15 offices scattered around.
266.
by 0x3f 7mo ago
Perhaps, but one would think those aren't the prime issues meriting first mention. I went in hoping for details of what Palantir is doing wrong _in Europe_, but all I got was some rallying the base cliches.
267.
by 0x3f 7mo ago
> A powerful company enables genocide in Gaza, helps ICE separate families, and fuels Trump’s war with Iran. Ah yes, European issues
268.
by 0x3f 7mo ago
Ponzi schemes have multiple participants and concealment. This is literally nothing like a Ponzi scheme apart from the fact that money moves from one concern to another. And even that's only on an accounting basis; it's all goin
269.
by 0x3f 7mo ago
"US adheres to the terms of its contract with Switzerland" wasn't as exciting a title, I suppose.
270.
by 0x3f 7mo ago
> What prevents the vendor from jacking up prices or general enshittification at the stage? Well what I'm proposing building would be source-available and licensed such that the gov can run it themselves if it ever gets too expensiv

More ›