0x3f

10 ms·

181.
by 0x3f 6mo ago
You're taking a strangely ethnocentric view here. I don't take the founding fathers' writings as a form of scripture. Those are but bare assertions.
182.
by 0x3f 6mo ago
But your glib response above was just to quote "the law", like this was a sufficient justification. If merely quoting the law is enough, then great, we already justified perfectly the copyright and jailing weed smokers stuff. It
183.
by 0x3f 6mo ago
> Should is an opinion. Well that would seem to make the rights in question not particularly inalienable. In fact if we're talking about the US slavery _is_ legal in certain contexts. So it's definitely not inalienable. Only
184.
by 0x3f 6mo ago
You understand that this is an entirely different form of argument than just linking to statute or case law.
185.
by 0x3f 6mo ago
America = literally the whole world and everyone in it so QED inalienable rights exist Well I wouldn't call it a strong argument... Nonetheless the goalposts were never shifted. The question was always 'should'. So I'm
186.
by 0x3f 6mo ago
Well now you're equivocating. We've established one that you can't deal in in a specific country. _Should_ is quite a different question. You can't establish should by establishing is.
187.
by 0x3f 6mo ago
> Sure, as long as it is within the framework of the law. You mean, like the one in the article the GP is pretending not to understand?
188.
by 0x3f 6mo ago
No I just mean in the sense that I give over the rights to my own words. I can't repeat them outside of the context that I've agreed to. They were both examples of the same kind of agreement. They'll keep those rights well
189.
by 0x3f 6mo ago
It's very boring for you not to actually commit to anything specific, so that you don't have to defend it.
190.
by 0x3f 6mo ago
Only for a very narrow definition of slavery. Arguably constructing society such that it costs so much to just exist (for example, by artificially restricting housing supply) and thus you have to work is not all that different to slavery.
191.
by 0x3f 6mo ago
Nobody forced her to break her contract and thus come up against that. She would have been perfectly fine on the leftovers from ~$500k/y while searching for her next job. The parent makes out like she simply had to get the extra mone
192.
by 0x3f 6mo ago
I'm not the one making a positive claim. I haven't even claimed such rights exist so why on earth would be the expectation be that I list them? You've assumed that I believe in this shared fiction. We sell ourselves into a
193.
by 0x3f 6mo ago
Please enumerate these inaliable basic freedoms that I should not be able to deal in.
194.
by 0x3f 6mo ago
So I can't sign an exclusive book deal? Or write for a newspaper?
195.
by 0x3f 6mo ago
I think you'll find the person in question's title is quite far from content moderator.
196.
by 0x3f 6mo ago
As if Meta employees live on the cusp of starving.
197.
by 0x3f 6mo ago
What are 'basic freedoms'?
198.
by 0x3f 6mo ago
> I guess I just don’t understand contracts and laws. What's to understand? Person agrees to thing. Person is held to thing.
199.
by 0x3f 6mo ago
I'm not sure these are functionally any different. Perhaps not caring is required to achieve certain goals.
200.
by 0x3f 6mo ago
That's... almost every AI paper.
201.
by 0x3f 6mo ago
Haven't read the paper yet, but it is interesting how seemingly simple many breakthroughs in ML are. Even transformers are like that. Maybe it's hindsight bias. I suppose we just don't have a deeper underlying theory to lea
202.
by 0x3f 6mo ago
Yeah as much as I avoid OpenAI for [reasons], the Rust TUI was really the move. Claude Code is a mess.
203.
by 0x3f 6mo ago
There's no way it was entirely written by Claude Code. But even if it were, collections and databases can be protected even if their individual elements are not.
204.
by 0x3f 6mo ago
Oh no, not 0.2% of their valuation! The end is near for Anthropic. Humanity is saved. By the copyright lobby, of all people.
205.
by 0x3f 6mo ago
The public is almost fully to blame, and gets the government it deserves. I only hedge a little because education is in control of the state, so to some degree people don't choose whether to be educated on the relevant matters. It may
206.
by 0x3f 6mo ago
If you use the [company name]@yourdomain.com form, people who work at [company name] often say "wow, you work for [company name]??"
207.
by 0x3f 6mo ago
No, why would they care about using pirated PDFs? Did you actually read/understand what I wrote? Violating their customers comes with risk for them. Violating the copyright of unrelated texbook authors does not. If that's even
208.
by 0x3f 6mo ago
More training data at this point leads to marginal improvements, curve is flattening. So advantage is low. Especially when Anthropic definitely has the budget and talent to carry out the same study. On the other hand, having it leak that
209.
by 0x3f 6mo ago
Only if you assume they don't honor their enterprise agreements.
210.
by 0x3f 6mo ago
If we assume they are on quotas then what difference does technology make? They had quotas before the technology, qualified immunity too. 100 false arrests with no recourse are 100 false arrests with no recourse. If anything I would expec

More ›