0x3f

5 ms·

61.
by 0x3f 4mo ago
Yeah, thats explicitly what I'm saying so I'm not sure it needs repeating. That has very little to do with it being lazy though, is the point. We were already implicitly discussing RoI when we were talking about 'legal conse
62.
by 0x3f 4mo ago
Every moment you spend doing accessibility is a moment you spend not doing other things. You could argue it has a high RoI to do accessibility, fine, but that doesn't make it lazy _not_ to do it. Maybe I have even higher RoI/EV
63.
by 0x3f 4mo ago
It's much more verbose and can't do everything Tailwind can anyway. E.g. how do you style a child on parent hover with the style attribute?
64.
by 0x3f 4mo ago
Sounds like you're kind of just talking your book though. Person who makes accessible sites suggests you need an accessible site. Blind people aren't the only ones who might need modifications. You could have an infinitely long
65.
by 0x3f 5mo ago
Perhaps, but that doesn't make a win for the copyright lobby a win for the little guy. If anything, pro-copyright decisions are decidedly _bad_ for the little guy.
66.
by 0x3f 5mo ago
They might 'win' reliably, but I don't believe the margin on outcome itself to be that great.
67.
by 0x3f 5mo ago
But in order for that to be required, it couldn't be 'blatant'. Unless you mean the admission itself is 'blatant'? Then, I suppose so, although the normal interpretation of that would be from the content itself.
68.
by 0x3f 5mo ago
HN really loves the copyright lobby when it's against someone they hate, huh
69.
by 0x3f 5mo ago
> A one shot prompt can only get an estimation of what you asked for, no matter how descriptive you are. Isn't that true of all creative outputs, even of 'legacy' provenance?
70.
by 0x3f 5mo ago
> Even at worst, it expresses intent, which has meaning to humans. We are humans. I can't force you to do anything, but I can ask you to. Don't disparage what it means to be humans talking to each other - it's one of the f
71.
by 0x3f 5mo ago
Well what purpose does the rule serve if it can't be enforced, if not signalling/norming?
72.
by 0x3f 5mo ago
You have to consider that any AI content worthy of the Oscar shortlist is going to be very high-quality, and likely intensely hand/human-tweaked in the first place. It's not from the general population of all AI content out there
73.
by 0x3f 5mo ago
I don't think AI-generated 'avatars' are anywhere close to being Oscar-worthy as things stand, so it seems kind of a moot point (hence the 'signalling' thing). If they ever get that good, I would just say you can&#x
74.
by 0x3f 5mo ago
I'm not sure how true this is. If you consider low-stakes crimes, typically to get to a steady state of effectiveness you need at least some sort of bootstrapped period of ubiquitous enforcement. If that's impossible then I'
75.
by 0x3f 5mo ago
Can you explain how an Oscar-worthy piece of writing would somehow be able to contain blatant AI-generated content? How would it have already passed the good-enough-for-an-Oscar filter?
76.
by 0x3f 5mo ago
How are there consequences for being caught if it's impossible to detect? Moreover, why stop here? There are many great rules that are impossible to enforce. Why not a rule that the author isn't allowed to have any racist though
77.
by 0x3f 5mo ago
It's much easier to tell if athletes are doping than to 'detect' AI in text that's already Oscar-for-writing level good. I would suggest the latter is quite literally impossible.
78.
by 0x3f 5mo ago
Obviously just performative signalling that doesn't really do much. You can't definitively tell if AI was used, so the rule can never realistically be enforced. Then again, the Oscars are surely almost entirely vibes based anyway
79.
by 0x3f 5mo ago
I think people are often just logged in for years and forget they're reading a paid resource.
80.
by 0x3f 5mo ago
Rent control is the canonical populist price control. That one's evergreen. Egg-prices-by-fiat are just a fad!
81.
by 0x3f 5mo ago
There is no way Walmart or Target or whoever is giving up their gold dust to some nameless SaaS for pricing. They will do it in-house. Never mind the fact that a similar aggregation attempt for the property rental market was considered ac
82.
by 0x3f 5mo ago
Just seems like a difference of degree. You have n price tiers in both situations. Traditionally, the complexity of n_prices = n_customers (or even n_prices = n_customer_contexts) was too painful to be worth it. But they were always appr
83.
by 0x3f 5mo ago
Yes (after user protest as I recall) but then the new UI just diverges over time, and quite possibly gets features not in the old one. I want the latest UI, and ideally the default UI, I just also want that not to be stupid. To be clear I
84.
by 0x3f 5mo ago
The Bitwarden UI/X changed relatively recently so that detail view is the default click action now, rather than fill. I don't think I've ever actually used the detail view, because the edit view does the same job. Never mind
85.
by 0x3f 5mo ago
Are you really concerned about asking these kinds of questions though? Like how many LLM-able Tiananmen Square questions are you needing answered per month really? And it seems like you know not to trust it, so there's not even a risk
86.
by 0x3f 5mo ago
I think you've just got perceptual tuning for the human to human context. It's like how human faces that are 5% different can be very obvious to us, but it's much harder to tell (for example) two cats apart at the same diffe
87.
by 0x3f 5mo ago
The CV of e.g. IQ is only 15%. That's in line with other 'natural' attributes of humans, but not compared to something like family wealth or background. From a quick Google, wealth is 700% in the US? Income also same OOM.
88.
by 0x3f 5mo ago
Even if you take IQ, a 2-sigma event on that distribution is 'only' around 130. A 130 outpaces a 100, sure, but it's hardly full on dominance in most tasks. Certainly much less powerful than just having rich or pushy parents
89.
by 0x3f 5mo ago
I suspect Demis 'gapped' you structurally (upbringing, early decisions, luck, positioning), moreso than via intelligence, which doesn't actually vary that widely in humans.
90.
by 0x3f 5mo ago
> more people getting scammed via "please tap the build number seven times and then go to extra settings and enable untrusted installs and then go to this website that I will dictate the URL of and you should ignore that install war

More ›