0x3f

20 ms·

421.
by 0x3f 8mo ago
There's a big difference in when you break silence though. Strategically, much better to keep it until all the facts are known to your side. At the start, the police/government have the informational advantage. In other countri
422.
by 0x3f 8mo ago
The US has a comparable per-mile road fatality rate. There's no 'havoc'.
423.
by 0x3f 8mo ago
The state is so powerful that inviduals should be given such affordances, and should be allowed the put the state to strict proof. Europe is a nonsense in this regard: you have rights, except all the special cases when you don't. You
424.
by 0x3f 8mo ago
Having driven in both, Americans don't take naturally to roundabouts and it would be difficult to teach all the existing drivers about them. Same in the UK when they add new rules: most drivers remain completely unaware of them.
425.
by 0x3f 8mo ago
Seems untenable because I can just lie to you about my intended use. I borrow your hammer to build a cabin. Oops, I actually used it to murder people. Enjoy the millions in damages.
426.
by 0x3f 8mo ago
They have the right to question, but I don't have to testify to anything, that's what the fifth ammendment is for. As usual, Europe doesn't care about internal consistency when it comes to rights. They just legislate (or rul
427.
by 0x3f 8mo ago
Is this relevant to the question of whether we should replace the link? Seems like we're going to spend a lot of time running down the views of the UBO of every domain posted here.
428.
by 0x3f 8mo ago
I think it's an excuse to do needed lay offs without saying as much. So yes, preserving signals, essentially. I've never met a tech company that didn't love expanding work to fill capacity, even if the work is of little val
429.
by 0x3f 8mo ago
A bit simplistic. The bakery can just expand its product range or do various other things to add work. In fact that's exactly what I would expect to happen at a tech company, ceteris paribus.
430.
by 0x3f 8mo ago
> It's terms of US law categories, it's less than graffiti on a fence The 'level' of the crime is only one aspect determining the treatment. Some crimes are inherently more prone to absconders, immigration infractions
431.
by 0x3f 8mo ago
I assume this is probably a function of our respective locations, because the most popular stories I see as an 'outsider' are those that would discourage tourism or immigration, not those that would worry already-citizens. To addr
432.
by 0x3f 8mo ago
These are all forms of false positives but the most popular news stories seem to be where they detain the correct person, correct legal status, lawfully, and the story happens to gloss over the facts about the legal status and focuses on th
433.
by 0x3f 8mo ago
The Moon is a Harsh Mistress covered this about 60 years ago. Although I did find PoI fun too. Gets a little bit of case-of-the-week syndrome sometimes.
434.
by 0x3f 8mo ago
Have they had a lot of false positives? Almost every story I see seems to fall apart on further investigation. To be clear, I'm sure they have some false positives, but do they have a lot of them relative to any other immigration sys
435.
by 0x3f 8mo ago
There's just no distinction between accounts like that, 'accounts' are just crypto wallets. There's no system that would ever care about the 'age' of your account here. There's no DD. If you have a wall
436.
by 0x3f 8mo ago
Yes, I basically do everything the lazy/thoughtless way for a first pass. I find in 99% of cases that's already performant enough and matches the intended data flow, but if you ever want to optimize it, you can. The same is also
437.
by 0x3f 8mo ago
Normally I would put as many invariants in the types as possible, then tests cover the rest. I'm curious how you do this/what you use it for though. Would be cool if you had any examples.
438.
by 0x3f 8mo ago
I find this doesn't work automatically for me because the projects I'm on have a lot of conditional compilation feature flags that it doesn't quite understand how to cargo check properly, unless I tell it. Maybe for your case
439.
by 0x3f 8mo ago
You can add a callback to e.g. Claude to guarantee it does a cargo check and test.
440.
by 0x3f 8mo ago
I think the intersection of FP and current AI is quite interesting. Purity provides a really tightly scoped context, so it almost seems like you could have one 'architect' model design the call graph/type skeleton at a high
441.
by 0x3f 8mo ago
I've never actually seen it get a compiler issue arising from lifetimes, so it seems to one-shot that stuff just fine. Although my work is typically middle of the road, non-HFT trading applications, not super low-level.
442.
by 0x3f 8mo ago
I think the more you can shift to compile time the better when it comes to agents. Go is therefore 'ok', but the type system isn't as useful as other options. I would say Rust is quite good for just letting something churn t
443.
by 0x3f 8mo ago
Switching out to an interpreted language has got to be anathema to a rewrite-it-in-Rust project
444.
by 0x3f 8mo ago
Not in this context it's not. Companies can't create Polymarket accounts. Polymarket accounts are just email addresses or alternatively crypto wallets. And there's no purpose I can imagine to aging them.
445.
by 0x3f 8mo ago
First of all I'm not sure what they did is criminal. And it would have been Polymarket. Nonetheless, you can just be a pre-existing OpenAI employee. As long as you take basic precautions, they (as in, OpenAI), are not going to be abl
446.
by 0x3f 8mo ago
Right but if you have the forethought to go buy such a wallet, you could just make one yourself in advance and create a transaction history. Although I would argue that even this doesn't have much value. It's not a big problem th
447.
by 0x3f 8mo ago
I don't really understand. You can create wallets at will. What would be the value of one that someone else happened to create?
448.
by 0x3f 8mo ago
I only assume it in a very weak sense, as in all I can really truly know is the solipsitic idea that I alone exist. In practical terms though, I'm very confident most people have considered these questions.
449.
by 0x3f 8mo ago
I'm not sure social media is a very good measure, there are many reasons that wondering aloud about this specific topic isn't really incentivized there. I'm not sure I've ever met anyone I would assume has not considered
450.
by 0x3f 8mo ago
> I never found anyone successfully argue against it. I think what you mean is you've never found a rule you personally prefer more, based purely on vibes. Which is all moral knowledge can ever be. It's easy to argue against t

More ›