Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
0points
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
13 ms
·
211.
▲
by
0points
1y ago
> This is why the industry term "coder" is a pejorative descriptor. It is not.
212.
▲
by
0points
1y ago
This guy likes to app.
213.
▲
by
0points
1y ago
Ok, that's another post by you, this time about XZ Spectrum and Z80 assembly. Let me rephrase my question: In what sense is Z80 related to the link in this thread, which is about using LLM to decode a golang(?) binary, which you also d
214.
▲
by
0points
1y ago
https://archive.is/SMVW7
215.
▲
by
0points
1y ago
> the z80 technique Z80 is a 8-bit CPU. Why is this name in the title? > Can you convert it into ASM then generate highly detailed technical specifications from it (including all strings for MCP tool calls and system prompt) as markdo
216.
▲
by
0points
1y ago
Oh, TIL! Thanks for adding that to the story. Indeed my experiences of vss was also not amazing and certainly got corrupted files too.
217.
▲
by
0points
1y ago
Well written. I am dealing with some similarities setting up a jellyfin server and the episode data of some series are rather incomplete. So I been contributing to tmdb for the last half year or so :)
218.
▲
by
0points
1y ago
Having used vss in the 90s myself, it surprised me it wasn't even mentioned. VSS (Visual SourceSafe) being Microsoft's own source versioning protocol, unlike Source Depot which was licensed from Perforce.
219.
▲
by
0points
1y ago
Not parent, but I'd recommend you get a lay of the land and not trust rando's ramblings.
220.
▲
by
0points
1y ago
Most recently, a github user opened a issue on one of my projects and asked "Why should I use this instead of Y". As a developer sharing my code online, I don't even know where to begin answering that. This is typical non-tec
221.
▲
by
0points
1y ago
> Even non-technical users click it just because "the little bug looked fun." So you want non-bug reports from non-tech people. Why? From my experience, exactly those reports are the ones that will never be addressed.
222.
▲
by
0points
1y ago
> The pelican's distinct look - and the fact that none of the models can capture it - is the whole point. You didn't even mention the beak or the lack of similarities in your blog. Your text is centered around this rather pecul
223.
▲
by
0points
1y ago
Enlighten me, what's so slow about the golang runtime?
224.
▲
by
0points
1y ago
Same in Sweden :-( Hundreds of millions of taxpayers money goes to Microsoft licenses for the public sector every year.
225.
▲
by
0points
1y ago
> Finally a language that compiles fast and is fast at runtime too. We been enjoying golang for the last decade and then some ;-)
226.
▲
by
0points
1y ago
So the only bird slightly resembling a pelican beak was drawn by gemini 2.5 pro. In general, none of the output resembles a pelican enough so you could separate it from "a bird". OP seem to ignore that pelican has a distinct look
227.
▲
by
0points
1y ago
Indeed, it's standard on redlib and some more places nowadays https://farside.link/redlib/
228.
▲
by
0points
1y ago
Nope, but I heard the sound before and I am at least 70% confident after asking my ornitholog friend :-) We don't have a huge load of animals making weird sounds around here, so one learns to recognize most of the strange ones after so
229.
▲
by
0points
1y ago
That's your made up magical explanation right there dude. Every day tech broism gets closer to a UFO sect.
230.
▲
by
0points
1y ago
Well, for once if the LLM:s they interact with or heck even the influencers they listen to would lead the way. I'll be happy the day the LLM says "I don't know".
231.
▲
by
0points
1y ago
I really like this app, but last night I had an encounter in the dark with the most weird alien sounding bird, that uses so low frequencies that the app couldnt make anything out of it. I realize this is a fault of my phones mic and not the
232.
▲
by
0points
1y ago
I really don't agree with the idea that expert time would just be spent typing, and I'd be really surprised if that's the common sentiment around here. An expert reasons, plans ahead, thinks and reasons a little bit more befo
233.
▲
by
0points
1y ago
To me, this is more in the line of reasoning seen in the underpant gnomes meme. 1. Collect underpants (use LLM) 2. ??? (magical thinking) 3. Profit (self awareness)
234.
▲
by
0points
1y ago
None of all of what you wrote. I was commenting on the assumption that self awareness would arise, and that thinking it will is a supernatural belief.
235.
▲
by
0points
1y ago
> The big change with LLMs seems to be that everyone now has an opinion on what programming/AI is and can do True, but I think this is just the zeitgeist. People today want to share their dumb opinions about any complex subject afte
236.
▲
by
0points
1y ago
> Been vibe coding for the past couple of months on a large project. > Half a million lines of code in a couple of months by one dev. smh.. why even. are you hoping for investors to hire a dev for you? > The best use case is to let
237.
▲
by
0points
1y ago
> it’s the competitive thing to do I'm expecting there should be at least some senior executive that realize how incredible destructive this is to their products. But I guess time will tell.
238.
▲
by
0points
1y ago
> don't you think that's a user problem? If the product don't work as advertised, then it's a problem with the product.
239.
▲
by
0points
1y ago
When it don't even compile or have clear intent, it's ambiguous in my book.
240.
▲
by
0points
1y ago
> Then I actually read the code. This is my experience in general. People seem to be impressed by the LLM output until they actually comprehend it. The fastest way to have someone break out of this illusion is tell them to chat with the
More ›