0manrho

12 ms·

121.
by 0manrho 1y ago
True, but people generally don't want to get evicted or have their utilities turned off either. If you need a job you need a job, and the numbers out of Cali's job market puts a lot of tech people in a position where they might no
122.
by 0manrho 1y ago
Far safer than overvolting. Changing settings can lead to stability issues no matter which way you push it frankly. If you're don't know what you're doing/aren't comfortable with it, probably not worth it.
123.
by 0manrho 1y ago
Didn't saw they draw the same, I openly acknowledge their more efficient. Said power user per rack unit is trending up. This is true of Apple DC's as well, especially with their new larger/fused chip initiatives. It's an
124.
by 0manrho 1y ago
Yes, I figured that much would be obvious to this crowd. Thus the "pseudo" part. The point isn't that there isn't a benefit, it's that you start to pay exponentially more energy per 0.1GHz at a certain point. Furthe
125.
by 0manrho 1y ago
He's not an expert on vaccines or infectious disease and pushed known provably false narratives during the pandemic.
126.
by 0manrho 1y ago
What makes you think that? They're small and efficient, that means they can pack large numbers of those into small spaces, resulting in a similar large power draw per volume occupied by equipment in the DC. This is especially true with
127.
by 0manrho 1y ago
Precisely. So how then can you claim that because it gave you a specific answer to a specific question, that it surely gave him a correct answer and it's his fault, when you don't even know what the hell he asked it?
128.
by 0manrho 1y ago
>You're hypothesizing that it gave him a medically dangerous answer, No. I'm saying AI is not infallible (regardless of context/field), it may have given him a medically sound answer, a medically dangerous one, or somethin
129.
by 0manrho 1y ago
> I'm not sure how long we'll need someone in the middle to actually review the code Always will, it's a question of how many people we need, not if. Well, until AGI (which I'm very bearish on in the near or even inte
130.
by 0manrho 1y ago
Just because it told *you* that, doesn't mean it told *him* that, in substance, tone, context, clarity and/or conciseness. There's plenty of non-tech literate people using tech, including AI, and they may not know how to prop
131.
by 0manrho 1y ago
Yep, I have a lot of experience with CXL devices and networked PCIe/NVMe (over Eth/IB) Fabrics and deploying "Headless"/"Micro-Head" compute units which are essentially just a pair of DPU's on a PCIe
132.
by 0manrho 1y ago
It's 19th of 83 (just barely making it inside the top quarter percentile) large population centers in the US, with 5,223 per 100,000 (~0.052 Per Capita) people Reported Incidents of Crime (all types) if using the adjusted[0] crime rate
133.
by 0manrho 1y ago
This is a legitimate problem in datacenters. They're getting to the point where a single 40(ish)OU/RU rack can pull a megawatt in some hyperdense cases. The talk of GPU/AI datacenters consuming inordinate amounts of energy is
134.
by 0manrho 1y ago
We're already there. That's what a lot of people are using DPU's are for. An example, This is storage instead of GPU's, but as the SSD's were PCIe NVMe, it's pretty nearly the same concept: https://w
135.
by 0manrho 1y ago
They use the USB-C physical interface for their modules, but that doesn't mean they actually use the USB protocol on the backend. Not sure how they implement it to be honest, but it's at least entirely possible for example to run
136.
by 0manrho 1y ago
3 actually: Realtek itself (Questionable quality on a good day) The implementation of Realtek by the ODM/OEM/SI into whatever part is being shipped, which given Realtek is the defacto "budget" option for networking, it&#
137.
by 0manrho 1y ago
> I suspect a lot of the flakiness is not the chip itself Most certainly. Doesn't change the fact that Realtek being present is a huge redflag, even if it's not a cheap device, regardless of whether it's realtek's fau
138.
by 0manrho 1y ago
> Everyone who says mac is unix and is just as good as linux is a fool and should never be trusted. Seconded. > Linux just works While there are instances where this is the case (System76 hardware w/ PopOS for example), This is c
139.
by 0manrho 1y ago
> I've had great luck with Realtek NICs, although I don't specifically recall using their USB NICs. I envy you. Realtek NICs (especially over USB) are tantamount to trash in my mind after 2 decades of fighting their frequent fa
140.
by 0manrho 1y ago
Responding to the article: Yeah, no shit. Glad to see someone is at least trying to do something about it, and I wish them luck. Relevant, from their about page: > noyb is a donation-funded NGO based in Vienna, Austria working to enforce
141.
by 0manrho 1y ago
This is yet another example of something that's happening all acrossed tech: (Over?)Correcting for a systemic problem; due to either/both misidentifying the problem, or reaching for the wrong solution that promises to solve the is
142.
by 0manrho 1y ago
That you're unsympathetic. It's not a hard concept to grasp. Sympathy (n): A feeling of pity or sorrow for the distress of another; commiseration. synonym: pity There are limits to what people can concern themselves with, whateve
143.
by 0manrho 1y ago
Native speaker here (American). I can read it, it's not necessarily difficult but it's much slower. I would not voluntarily read any book or long form text written in this script. This feels very much the same as those experimen
144.
by 0manrho 1y ago
It's always possible to try, especially as it seems there was a technical violation here, but whether it's worth it or likely to gain enough legal traction to yield results is another story, especially in instances of "your A
145.
by 0manrho 1y ago
Lacking sympathy for someone does not mean you condone them losing/lacking rights.
146.
by 0manrho 1y ago
Fully agreed on all points. I'm fine with either, but now is the time to change all considered. Personally I prefer ECMAscript as I already have a familiarity there, but you make an excellent point about webscript being a better genera
147.
by 0manrho 1y ago
Well yeah, because that's not what the person they were replying to was asking about. They were asking a "when" question of sorts, tangential to the root topic, not a why.
148.
by 0manrho 1y ago
My sentiment exactly. Unless it's FOSS for some reason, anything Adobe - especially if it's work/income related - is a hard pass.
149.
by 0manrho 1y ago
Precisely. It's why I find this pursuit of making a computer think like a human a fucking fools errand. Great. It can make mistakes at 1 Billion times a second, but do so confidently and convincingly enough that people just believe the
150.
by 0manrho 1y ago
Thats some semantic pedantic gymnastics. Even if you could persuade me to agree with you (and I very much do not) it does not matter. The only definition that matters here is the governments, and they LOVE overreach.

More ›