0dayz

14 ms·

241.
by 0dayz 2y ago
You can't claim that that's what functionalism is, it has a different name. Or should we say monkey shit now when we mean president?
242.
by 0dayz 2y ago
Not exactly, fentanyl epidemic was specifically started by one family seek profit and ousted doctors to over prescribe it while claiming it was mildly addictive. The war on drugs have caused immeasurable harm due to failure to understand mo
243.
by 0dayz 2y ago
I highly doubt you hold this degree of standard to any other person who was caught in similar obvious predicament. Saying "oh this forum doesn't like him therefor we don't need to see this" is just bizarre, since then pe
244.
by 0dayz 2y ago
This really depends on the scope of the project or the philosophy of the project. Personally I have pretty much sworn off webapps because of the amount of separate concerns: * the web stack (html+css+ts) * framework quirks * dom vs vdom * n
245.
by 0dayz 2y ago
I always wondered what is the difference between OS level secure erasure and software level secure erasure?
246.
by 0dayz 2y ago
It's not very surprisingly that it got a real political bias: >UnHerd was founded in 2017 by the billionaire hedge fund manager Sir Paul Marshall as its owner and publisher and conservative British political activist Tim Montgomerie
247.
by 0dayz 2y ago
>You need to understand that not everyone shares your addiction to YT's dopamine-jerking content feeds. In any case, no one has time to dig through that video to find whatever "evidence" you think is buried there. I can&#x
248.
by 0dayz 2y ago
>Who would have ever thought that pushing a cold-war coalition eastwards towards an ex-superpower, including shoving it in its very borders, which it has long declared a "red line", would ever cause an invasion? This is weird t
249.
by 0dayz 2y ago
>I wonder why she resigned right before the convention. When there's a scandal you tend to try and ensure at the very least to distance yourself from those who caused the scandal, hence why she left "right before the convention
250.
by 0dayz 2y ago
>I don't remember them saying that. I do remember them showing US political and financial involvement in Ukraine. They intentionally leaves out sources they claim to have, they cut crucial parts of video evidence (such as Joe Biden&
251.
by 0dayz 2y ago
Seriously that channel? The same channel who said it's nato and the west's fault that Russia is invading Ukraine? Who also did a fluff piece on north Korea?
252.
by 0dayz 2y ago
Big donors in the democratic party overwhelmingly support ultra-progressive policies: https://calgara.github.io/PolS5310_Spring2021/Broockman%20&%... You're talking about national elections, and even then the
253.
by 0dayz 2y ago
This doesn't make any sense, people are the ones who decide how will get elected and if they cross path with big donors then this won't magically make said people want to vote for the big donor candidates.
254.
by 0dayz 2y ago
And there it is. Just because corporate media is supported by big business doesn't translate to the actual politicians being pro-corporations. Especially when ironically enough big donors towards democrats are almost all ultra-progress
255.
by 0dayz 2y ago
Oh totally, I think that if you guys had somehow manage to get LucasArt to make it or some other notoriously good Point'n Click studio and not... the makers of such classics like: Zelda games for the Philips CD-i or IM ME'EN.
256.
by 0dayz 2y ago
>This just reads as a random mishmash of missteps the company has taken over its 33 years of existence (remember, it's older than Amazon or Google) rather than a proper critique of when it arguably lost its shine in the public'
257.
by 0dayz 2y ago
Nope, all of these things happened before the merger, the fact that Diablo 3, Starcraft 2, etc. was released after the merger doesn't change the fact that Blizzard was dragging their feet on those IPs.
258.
by 0dayz 2y ago
Which was pure and utter luck from scrapping a 10-ish year old project which who knows much much money they threw in. What if Overwatch would've been a huge failure? Would we still vindicate Blizzard's failed 2nd MMO?
259.
by 0dayz 2y ago
There was also imo a big cultural hubris among the Blizzard developers that if it wasn't done their way (i.e. they couldn't just take an existing IP like Dota and slap Blizzard logo on it, no no, had to start from scratch).
260.
by 0dayz 2y ago
>Static? Dota 2 is not a dynamic game? Not why wdym by "micromanaged" - Meepo, Nature prophet? Dota 2 afaik still relies heavily on static effects such as on click effects rather than LoL where it's mostly just a matter of
261.
by 0dayz 2y ago
To be fair this list is only mostly during or at the time when Blizzard was still semi-independent i.e. not merged with Activision yet.
262.
by 0dayz 2y ago
The problem was the timing, Starcraft 2 mechanics wise is fine even if they made some really whimsical balance changes that plagued the esport scene until it was almost pulled off life support (similar to how Overwatch couldn't balance
263.
by 0dayz 2y ago
The issue is effectively that Blizzard released Starcraft 2 during a time where RTS was seen as a forgotten genre entirely, the best you had was the Company of Heroes & Dawn of War. If they had released it 5 years earlier it might have
264.
by 0dayz 2y ago
Nope, it started waaay before that. * The sexual misconduct most likely happened way before it came out publicly as all the sleezebags stayed until it was public * real id debacle * Diablo 3 * shutting down blizzard north, despite working o
265.
by 0dayz 2y ago
It's quite odd not to even give an inch of admission that she fucked up somewhere.
266.
by 0dayz 2y ago
There's a big difference between piracy as in free version vs parasitic piracy which is when you got someone selling the version that is pirated.
267.
by 0dayz 2y ago
I don't believe any side who doesn't present in a good evidence based way, in other words verifiable and or replicable data. On that front China has a far worse track record and institutions that uses evidence based truth telling.
268.
by 0dayz 2y ago
So by definition every state is this? How exactly would we know this?
269.
by 0dayz 2y ago
>Same can't be said about Iraq, can it? Iraq got most of the weapons from the USSR. If you mean it's WMD, that was done by tricking the west by proclaiming that Iraq was going to be using chemicals used in WMD for non WMD uses.
270.
by 0dayz 2y ago
Friends are a form of interest, so why try and separate the two?

More ›