Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
010101010101
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
31.
▲
by
010101010101
1y ago
Developers who don’t understand how the most basic aspects of systems they work on function are a dime a dozen already, I’m not sure LLMs change the scale of that problem.
32.
▲
by
010101010101
1y ago
The best managers I’ve ever had didn’t use Jira, because they didn’t use much of anything at all, and more senior engineers were trusted to manage work streams and run projects without needing to conform to a process demanded by someone not
33.
▲
by
010101010101
1y ago
No one's argued he doesn't have tattoos, that the tattoos are only/most explainable as gang related is the point being argued. Your list of "usual suspects" cite actual experts and not random Twitter nonsense.
34.
▲
by
010101010101
1y ago
A simple search of “Abrego Garcia tattoos” will yield you dozens of refutations of this and no support aside from the White House propaganda machine.
35.
▲
by
010101010101
1y ago
That’s absolutely not why there’s a lot of pushback. There’s a lot of pushback because of: - a general sense of authoritarian policy degrading American democracy - inhumane treatment of detainees - illegal deportations happening with no du
36.
▲
by
010101010101
1y ago
> When a starving African child succumbs to measles, the miasmist attributes the death to malnutrition; germ theory proponents (a.k.a. virologists) blame the virus. This is in the second paragraph and is exactly what tfa represented. It
37.
▲
by
010101010101
1y ago
Are you implying that this makes the host sick or dead or that this somehow leads to pathogens jumping to humans that otherwise wouldn’t have? This is a last resort so I’m not sure how it matters in the former case, and the latter seems li
38.
▲
by
010101010101
1y ago
How?
39.
▲
by
010101010101
1y ago
They don’t have paywalls, so there’s that.
40.
▲
by
010101010101
1y ago
“Is unlikely to exist” and “does not exist” are two very different statements, but it really doesn’t matter because GP’s point stands if you replace the exaggerated IQ with something reasonable like 160.
41.
▲
by
010101010101
1y ago
The nature of the service is completely irrelevant.
42.
▲
by
010101010101
1y ago
Do you expect him just to let the service remain broken or to scale up to infinite cost to himself on this volunteer project? He worked with the project author to find a solution that works for both and does not degrade service for every ot
43.
▲
by
010101010101
1y ago
Circa ~2007/8 they were both very much on equal footing as far as popularity with individual engineers goes. The Linux kernel being on Git gave it an allure to most that Mercurial never had, but it was GitHub’s ascendancy that really s
44.
▲
by
010101010101
1y ago
I like to remind those I mentor that The Company’s sole goal for their employment is to extract more value from them than they are paid - not because The Company is evil, but because that’s just what’s required in a capitalist endeavor. But
45.
▲
by
010101010101
1y ago
I worked on a couple of public facing SharePoint 2010 sites for large, well known companies before while it was in RC and immediately after - MS had a big marketing push to get people to build more than Intranet portals on it at the time. I
46.
▲
by
010101010101
1y ago
quick, do startup and upstart next
47.
▲
by
010101010101
1y ago
neither Java nor .Net have implicit string to boolean conversions, the only way to asses the truthiness of a string is an explicit conversion - there’s no “if(someStringVariable)” - that’s just a type error at compile time.
48.
▲
by
010101010101
1y ago
It’s the _existence_ of an implicit conversion from string to boolean that the parent is pointing out as a problem, not how it’s implemented. But that’s Jãvascript bb
49.
▲
by
010101010101
1y ago
I framed my experience in contrast to the parent’s assertion, and no, I did not make any claim about universality. Be sure that not everyone loves this or any show all you want. You’re continuing to project some sort of nonsense gotcha logi
50.
▲
by
010101010101
1y ago
I described myself being poor (“working class”) and not being poor any more, whatever you’re attempting to read between the lines beyond that isn’t there.
51.
▲
by
010101010101
1y ago
I don’t have any empirical evidence to refute you, but it connected with me as a 17 year old kid living in a mobile home in Mississippi. Almost 25 years later, and in a much different socioeconomic state, it still does. Stories steeped in h
52.
▲
by
010101010101
1y ago
I think it’s pretty well understood that the money/happiness relationship is initially very strongly correlated but reaches a point of rapidly diminishing returns once a certain economic threshold is met. i.e. it’s nearly impossible t
53.
▲
by
010101010101
1y ago
Why?
54.
▲
by
010101010101
1y ago
“With high throughput and low latency” are the operative requirements for OP and GQL doesn’t help with either on its own.
55.
▲
by
010101010101
2y ago
I think there are valid complaints about the number of git commands / flags and the quality of the docs not helping users understand them, but in my experience _most_ developers who complain about git both have never used any other VCS
56.
▲
by
010101010101
2y ago
No ones using this to actually get useful information. The key thing is people watching and hoping something wacky happens, are you unaware of just how popular “IRL” streaming is with gen-z/alpha?
57.
▲
by
010101010101
3y ago
This article presents a weird description of “estranged” that seems to be hinting at a more of an active choice by a child to ignore a parent, which to me screams “over political differences.” I can’t tell if it’s attempting to include pare
58.
▲
by
010101010101
3y ago
I rarely find interfacing with an external chat interface useful, but integration with the coding environment (e.g. Copilot) is an immediate productivity boost.
59.
▲
by
010101010101
3y ago
I don’t think that’s what’s implied here at all - the focus on blamelessness is to get to the root cause of failure and prevent future occurrences rather than to punish existing failures without affecting any actual change.
60.
▲
by
010101010101
3y ago
They did evolve it with Inbox, and then subsequently killed Inbox to roll worse functionality into Gmail proper.
More ›