001sky

35 ms·

271.
by 001sky 12y ago
The executive branch has the ability to define lawful when congress provides them leeway to do so. thats exactly what these rules are about. so that's an important qualifier I would think. All three branches of government dictate what
272.
by 001sky 12y ago
Is that why its so ugly? No.
273.
by 001sky 12y ago
to be heard, not seen
274.
by 001sky 12y ago
My point is simply that the title "partner" in no way confers level playing field (as the earlier commenter implied). Junior partner is like "associate", its almost meaningless if you are relying on that solely for assem
275.
by 001sky 12y ago
Your conflating standard "harrassment" with "sexual harassmenet" they are not at all the same thing. Sexual harassment requires (by the definition you cite) things of a a sexual nature to be integral to the harassment. B
276.
by 001sky 12y ago
"Pao and Nazre were both partners." This glosses over a significant problem. Partners are stratified like professors at univesrity. The issue about resolving any conflict by the junior-status person taking up with a new employer i
277.
by 001sky 12y ago
cattle food is going into the food-system as a subsidy for human food... ie it is making high-quality proteing cheaper.... on the other hand, ethanol just makes people food more expensive....and it sucks as a fuel anyway (engineering reason
278.
by 001sky 12y ago
There's a lot of interesing stuff in this comment. But it seems to conflate lead-gen with advertising. There are lots of reasons to advertise that don't relate to the sales funnel. The second issue is alot of internet advertising
279.
by 001sky 12y ago
A carbohydrate is any calorie not from fat or protein. You are eating them with all fresh foods, basically.
280.
Obama Says He Didn't Know Hillary Clinton Was Using Private Email Address(nytimes.com)
2 points by 001sky 12y ago|0 comments
281.
by 001sky 12y ago
It adds nothing to the discussion. If the guy did something major (case#1), the discussion is over. It just makes the person asking the question look like an ass. The other issue is that anyone who would have a reply of that caliber most li
282.
by 001sky 12y ago
Lets say the dude invented something important? are you to have a better follow up question? If your point is that they commenter is delusional, and at once over-estimating himself and under-estimating others, you should come up with a bett
283.
The Cost of Paying Attention(nytimes.com)
6 points by 001sky 12y ago|0 comments
284.
Clinton e-mail review could find security issues(washingtonpost.com)
2 points by 001sky 12y ago|0 comments
285.
Astronomers Observe Supernova and Find They’re Watching Reruns(nytimes.com)
10 points by 001sky 12y ago|0 comments
286.
by 001sky 12y ago
White house said this behaviour broke specific policy guidance, but the NY Times reports that setup was well known and a "status symbol"for the SOS. Those two things don't add up. How can it be that breaking policy was a stat
287.
by 001sky 12y ago
I wonder if Clinton was such a "rock star" that she had a non-standard employment agreement? My gut tells me she didn't take the job using "standard docs" but who knows.
288.
by 001sky 12y ago
This answer is too flip. In corporate america, you might be able to use a personal e-mail as a stop-gap measure but not as a primary communication. Not in any fortune 50 or whatevr company with compliance and security infrastructure. This
289.
by 001sky 12y ago
There are (clinically) lots of times people don't pay attention and 'tune things out' due to hyper-viigilance. That process leads to somewhat fractured long-term memory. Basically your brain starts to use short-term memory fo
290.
by 001sky 12y ago
People who try to be entirely analytical about everything are rarely good founders. This is true, but the way people go about the process of sorting out the other elements is a critical part of the analysis (pardon the wording). I think
291.
Clinton’s E-Mail System Built for Privacy Though Not Security(bloomberg.com)
2 points by 001sky 12y ago|0 comments
292.
by 001sky 12y ago
This is too strong a response. You and nobody else has a 1:1 memory map of an intense experience. It can takes weeks if not months (plural) to remember everything that happened to you in the last month. That is because basically your brain
293.
by 001sky 12y ago
Per WH policy... "Former secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton appears to have operated in violation of what the White House said Tuesday was “very specific guidance” that members of the Obama administration use government e-mail a
294.
by 001sky 12y ago
The story seems a bit more complicated on how it was setup. It was unclear whom Clinton hired to set up or maintain her private email server, which the AP traced to a mysterious identity, Eric Hoteham. That name does not appear in public r
295.
by 001sky 12y ago
So what is "pretty well" in this context? Damned if I know. If you have acess to capital at 0% interest rates, you are doing fine.
296.
by 001sky 12y ago
Today, Former secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton appears to have operated in violation of what the White House said Tuesday was “very specific guidance” that members of the Obama administration use government e-mail accounts to carr
297.
by 001sky 12y ago
Let me say I agree that there needs to be standards. Both on security and record retention. I don't think those are inherently partisan issues.
298.
by 001sky 12y ago
The security implications of the US Secretary of State using an un-secure email seem far more problematic. We may very well find out that the US security services were complicit in the Clinton arrangement. It would truly be absurd for a mod
299.
by 001sky 12y ago
Stuff like this doesn't just pop out of nowhere. It's very clear this is the start of a campaign against Hillary True, but isn't this Obama's leak? He surely was sending e-mails to his Secretary of state at the @phony
300.
by 001sky 12y ago
They own (scarce) rights to broad-band spectrum.

More ›