Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
000ooo000
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
91.
▲
by
000ooo000
10mo ago
Any merit in your comment was eroded by the unnecessary snark
92.
▲
by
000ooo000
10mo ago
There's value in the struggle, learning what questions to ask, handling the questions following a question, articulating what it is that you want to know, learning how to have an exchange of information with another human being, and be
93.
▲
by
000ooo000
10mo ago
What kind of mindset do you need to have to trust anything a company like this has to say? A company riding the hype train, praying the bubble doesn't pop, desperately trying to even turn a profit? Would you believe cigarettes are heal
94.
▲
by
000ooo000
10mo ago
You're much more charitable than I am. I would not call that forgivable.
95.
▲
by
000ooo000
10mo ago
Straightforward statements with a few conditionals considered harmful. Here learn this grotesque vendor-specific DSL hamfisted into YAML instead.
96.
▲
by
000ooo000
10mo ago
Where does one get to suffer YAML hell then??
97.
▲
by
000ooo000
10mo ago
Have used all of the big 4 forges in anger over the last decade. GitLab isn't perfect, but I'd take it over GitHub any day of the week.
98.
▲
by
000ooo000
10mo ago
The design here says a lot, and not subtly. Look how human this all is, with our paintings and serifs . Nice try.
99.
▲
by
000ooo000
10mo ago
OK, so we keep banging on about it forever? Move on
100.
▲
by
000ooo000
10mo ago
Counter-perspective: my WFH office setup is the exact same setup I game and do personal dev on. I'm a button-press away from my KB+M+LCD pointing at my much-more-enjoyable home PC (my corporate device is laughably bad). I don't fi
101.
▲
by
000ooo000
10mo ago
>Wherever LLM-generated code is used, it becomes the responsibility of the engineer. As part of this process of taking responsibility, self-review becomes essential: LLM-generated code should not be reviewed by others if the responsible
102.
▲
by
000ooo000
10mo ago
Thanks for the reply. Would be a useful service, good luck with it.
103.
▲
by
000ooo000
10mo ago
They just gave you a potential customer's perspective. The fact you wrote this off as uninteresting is telling.
104.
▲
by
000ooo000
10mo ago
Awesome, I was imagining how something like this would be good for me at home. This almost seems perfect, and autossh + the ssh 'aliases' (d.term) in the readme are new to me so TIL. Thanks for sharing.
105.
▲
by
000ooo000
10mo ago
There is no way I would provide the password I use on multiple sites to some random app, and there's absolutely no way I'd do that if I had any inkling it was vibe coded.
106.
▲
by
000ooo000
11mo ago
I had a boss ask me to prepare $thing he would later copy into the appropriate place. Called me over to his desk, couldn't copypaste it into the textarea. Keystrokes weren't pasting. Whatever he was doing was definitely not Ctrl+V
107.
▲
by
000ooo000
11mo ago
"New thing good, old thing bad" - also people throughout all of recorded human history
108.
▲
by
000ooo000
11mo ago
I'm fine excluding people who can't ask a very simple question when they encounter an acronym they don't recognise. I'm also fine excluding people who think they're owed something because they're ignorant.
109.
▲
by
000ooo000
11mo ago
How did Scrum Master escape this treatment?
110.
▲
by
000ooo000
11mo ago
>Simply mashing a few letters together can be empowering for ourselves while being exclusionary for others. It’s an artifact—albeit a small one—of our egos. We know what the technobabble means. Our justified place in the universe is main
111.
▲
by
000ooo000
11mo ago
Today I was using $tool with some dense docs and average forums. In a moment of weakness, I asked an LLM. It said, "just use strpos! :magic_wand:". Of course, strpos didn't exist, but it was in the question for the top resu
112.
▲
by
000ooo000
11mo ago
Subjects selected from local gun store line
113.
▲
by
000ooo000
11mo ago
Are we going to continue caveating your silly opinion until it makes sense?
114.
▲
by
000ooo000
11mo ago
You've assumed there's only one reason for designing a language and based your opinion around that, which makes it shallow and not terribly convincing.
115.
▲
by
000ooo000
11mo ago
Are you required to be part of this union, if it forms?
116.
▲
by
000ooo000
11mo ago
Yep, they remind me of the free 'domains' you used to be able to get back in 2000-2005 that were crap like mydomain.ko.cc. By far the least legitimate one I see is .ai - I seem to immediately write those off as some half-baked cha
117.
▲
by
000ooo000
1y ago
https://github.com/microsoft/call-center-ai?tab=readme-ov-fi... One annoying part of the new AI world is these worthless AI-generated diagrams. I don't mean AI generated the pixels, I mean it was asked to generate
118.
▲
by
000ooo000
1y ago
The same, you say?
119.
▲
by
000ooo000
1y ago
>There isn't a book on earth that could answer the question "which remaining parts of my codebase still use the .permission_allowed() method and what edge-cases do they have that would prevent them from being upgraded to the ne
120.
▲
by
000ooo000
1y ago
If you want to shit talk LLMs, you better come armed with research, buddy. Claims about how it will revolutionise every profession just need n=1 anecdata though.
More ›