0-_-0

25 ms·

301.
Microsoft Building AI Upscaler to Compete with DLSS, FidelityFX(tomshardware.com)
2 points by 0-_-0 5y ago|0 comments
302.
by 0-_-0 5y ago
I wish the new Fallout games got that right so well!
303.
by 0-_-0 5y ago
From 61 studies on Ivermectin you cherrypicked one of the 5 with a negative effect: https://ivmmeta.com/#fig_fpall
304.
by 0-_-0 5y ago
Now I know where the old Fallout games borrowed their car aesthetics from: https://fallout.fandom.com/wiki/Chryslus_Motors_Corporation#...
305.
by 0-_-0 5y ago
Can we use this data to calculate how many rogue planets per star are in our galaxy?
306.
by 0-_-0 5y ago
I'm not complaining, I'm pointing out that the Delta variant also has a higher chance of hospitalisation, not just getting sick.
307.
by 0-_-0 5y ago
The next sentence is: From May 2 to June 5, the efficacy rate in preventing hospitalization was 98.2%, compared with 93% from June 6 to July 3 That's a 4x higher chance of hospitalisation.
308.
by 0-_-0 5y ago
It's still much more realistic than Roko's Basilisk :)
309.
by 0-_-0 5y ago
Additionally: 1. There wasn't a consensus, some scientists disagreed 2. A natural virus can leak from a lab Also, a reminder that biosecurity incidents are common, there were about 17 in the last decade [0]. Just (natural) SARS-CoV-1 l
310.
by 0-_-0 5y ago
I'm sure the word "variant" doesn't suggest official association. "Version" would.
311.
by 0-_-0 5y ago
Because someone already checked, and it doesn't: https://docs.github.com/en/github/copilot/research-recitatio... Every literally quoted part that could infringe appears at least 10 times in the training
312.
Stockfish 14(stockfishchess.org)
440 points by 0-_-0 5y ago|196 comments
313.
by 0-_-0 5y ago
The PICO-8 has a Nim-based variant called Nico: https://github.com/ftsf/nico
314.
by 0-_-0 5y ago
Turing completeness applies to models of computation, not hardware. Otherwise, nothing would be Turing-complete because infinite memory doesn't exist in the real world. Just read the first sentence of what you linked to: In computabili
315.
by 0-_-0 5y ago
Surprising how extremely rarely Copilot quotes text verbatim.
316.
by 0-_-0 5y ago
Which would be extremely slow
317.
by 0-_-0 5y ago
> The human brain isn't Turing-complete as that would require infinite memory. This is wrong, this is not what Turing completeness is. It applies to computational models, not hardware. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki&#
318.
by 0-_-0 5y ago
Exactly, why not report both? I for one would want to know both.
319.
by 0-_-0 5y ago
If you're right, there should be a correlation with stidy size and results (I'll check for this tomorrow if I remember). It would still have to be explained why do small studies show a much worse result for HCQ than Ivermectin.
320.
by 0-_-0 5y ago
I see your point that it could be P-hacking (as in https://xkcd.com/882/ ), but why would Ivermectin be so much more P-hacked than HCQ?
321.
by 0-_-0 5y ago
Ha, I have a similar story with strage red spots appearing on my back the day after vacciantion. Turns out it was from sitting on a bench.
322.
by 0-_-0 5y ago
The second number should take into account the population and probablility of getting COVID, so it should be: (probablilty of contracting COVID) * (probablity of heart injury in the military from COVID if someone contracts COVID)
323.
by 0-_-0 5y ago
Isn't your last paragraph describing a randomized controlled trial? The page lists 31 for Ivermectin [0] and (for comparison) 40 for HCQ [1]. I don't find the evidence for HCQ convincing, but Ivermectin seems solid from what I can
324.
by 0-_-0 5y ago
> couldn't you argue that it's working as it should? Let's say that it's doing exactly what it was trained to do.
325.
by 0-_-0 5y ago
It's worth keeping in mind that what a neural network like this (just like GPT3) is doing is generating the most probable continuation based on the training dataset. Not the best continuation (whatever that means), simply the most li
326.
by 0-_-0 5y ago
This is a very famous function [0] and likely appears multiple times in the training set (Google gives 40 hits for GitHub), which makes it more likely to be memorized by the network. [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F
327.
by 0-_-0 5y ago
Then you have to explain why are results about Ivermectin more likely to be thrown out than studies about hydroxychloroquine ( https://hcqmeta.com/ ), which has only 73.8% positive studies and shows much smaller improvement.
328.
by 0-_-0 5y ago
I vaguely recall a study where they took suicidal people and employed them as lifeguards with great results.
329.
by 0-_-0 5y ago
Now I'm waiting for your YouTube video on it!
330.
by 0-_-0 5y ago
I understand the P-hacking problem, but if that was the source of the positive result in the meta analysis that would mean that scientists are throwing away 95% of their studies on one of the most promising COVID treatments during a pandemi

More ›