> Classes are pretty nice. It's a syntax sugar which is nicer and easier to understand than using functions and prototypes. I actually think that this syntax s

> Classes are pretty nice. It's a syntax sugar which is nicer and easier to understand than using functions and prototypes. I actually think that this syntax sugar is the opposite of a solution. It has always been tricky getting developers coming in from other languages (mainly C-like, and Java-like) to understand that JS is NOT an object-oriented language, but in fact is a prototypal language. By adding the class keyword, I think this only confuses those users further.