3 ms·
No, they didn't -- getting the absorption spectrum of a transiting exoplanet is an order of magnitude or two beyond the capabilities of present-day instruments.
by hugh_ 17y ago
No, they didn't -- getting the absorption spectrum of a transiting exoplanet is an order of magnitude or two beyond the capabilities of present-day instruments. They just measured the density.
From the density, though, you can get a pretty good idea of what it looks like. There are three basic ingredients which go into making planets: rock (including pure metals), "ice" (a catch-all term which includes all phases of water along with methane and ammonia) and hydrogen/helium mixture. Everything else is too rare to worry about. Knowing (basically) the density of each of these components, plus knowing the fact that H/He mixture won't accrete to a body until its mass goes beyond a certain point, you can put pretty good constraints on what the composition of a planet of a certain mass and radius should be.
Of course we could be wrong -- it could equally well be a ball of pure argon or something; however it's hard to imagine how any such thing would form.
- tocomment 17y agoSo how do they know the mass?
- hugh_ 17y agoThis can be obtained by looking at the red/blue-shift of the star as it wobbles back and forth due to the planet's motion. Combine this with the mass of the star, and you can figure out the mass of the planet. I forget how you get the mass of the star, but I think it can be pretty well established from its brightness.