5 ms·
Justin.tv Testifies to Congress about its Copyright Protection Systems
- nkassis 17y agoThe last guy had to bring up 3-strikes laws. Sorry but that idea is as bad as the DMCA at protecting both copyright owners and customers. Internet is fast becoming a necessity for most people. Cutting off a family for one kid's actions is not the way to go. Or a whole coffee shop as another example.
- rms 17y agoMichael Seibel starts at about 21:00 and gets a very nice introduction for how much everyone else seems to want his blood.
- JacobAldridge 17y agoFrom the chair, welcoming Michael: "an amazing young man...we recognize his talent" Michael then does an excellent job outlining the company and, most importantly, the purpose and vision behind the Justin.tv product.
- rms 17y agoHe really does a great job, though the captioners got his title wrong (he's the CEO). I skimmed through and watched for when Michael comes back again at the end. By this time, his facial expressions show that he also knows he is kicking ass. The person on the House panel makes it clear that they aren't going to take any action immediately as long as Michael is willing to work with them to prevent piracy, to which he readily agrees.
- jtvdeveloper 17y agoI like the very end of part 2, (http://www.c-spanarchives.org/program/290734-2 http://www.c-spanarchives.org/program/290734-2) where Michael talks about the "Guide to putting TV on JTV" that was introduced into the record. He was all: "If you used this guide, you would not be streaming TV. This is totally for people trying to stream XBox and PS3 games"
- blahedo 17y agoBut if the instructions are geared to forking the console-to-TV output, wouldn't those instructions work perfectly to fork the cable-box-to-TV output as well? EDIT: The page referred to seems to be http://www.justin.tv/p/video_games http://www.justin.tv/p/video_games (since renamed to "Broadcasting video games") and indeed seems to be cast in terms of video game broadcast, but afaict the instructions would work just fine for broadcast content as well.
- amichail 17y agoIs it true that Justin.tv has a legal incentive not to actively look for and remove pirated content? http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=997115 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=997115
- rms 17y agoSure, Michael says this during his testimony when talking about the DMCA.
- jtvdeveloper 17y agoThe way the DMCA is currently commonly interpreted, as soon as JTV makes its own decisions on what content can be on the site, it loses DMCA safe harbor provisions. Unless that editorial control is 100% accurate and 100% effective, any error whatsoever will make JTV liable for damages.
- amichail 17y agoHow did such a law get passed?
- vaksel 17y agolobbyists
- trafficlight 17y agoSame way as all the other terrible laws that get passed.
- tptacek 17y agoDammit. Off by one.
- JacobAldridge 17y agoFirst 7 digit palindrome, if that helps ease your pain.
- vv 17y agoSomething about watching Justin.tv on CSPAN doesn't feel right.
- mace 17y agoIt is painful to watch this. There's a HUGE opportunity for these companies to provide live sports content in a simple and unrestricted (i.e. not locked-in to a particular ISP in the case of ESPN 360) way on the web and these companies are blowing it.
- keltecp11 17y agoLike all big companies... they refuse to innovate. It is such a shame. Partner with Justin.tv Don't take them to Congress!
- nkassis 17y agoI'll pay for ESPN 360 if they let me. I already pay for the college sport package on sat but I have to get off the computer to watch. Just let me subscribe ESPN, please. As a side note, live broadcasting has a huge advantage over recorded tv. Ads can't be removed. Just put the feeds up for free and make your advertisers pay more.
- tlrobinson 17y agoAmusing comment from a congressman at 76:25...