4 ms·
The first comment picked by NYT staff on that article is from a retired cop. It is very telling: "I was a Police Officer in Phx for 30 years, and fortunately n
by enraged_camel 11y ago
The first comment picked by NYT staff on that article is from a retired cop. It is very telling:
"I was a Police Officer in Phx for 30 years, and fortunately never had to shoot anyone, but was shot at four times and hit once.
I was in several situations that I would have been justified in shooting!
Were I an officer in todays world, (retired 20 years ago) I would probably be more likely to use deadly force in situations like I encountered. It is a much more dangerous world today and I cringe each time I see an officer making a stop. I still carry and at each stop I see being made I prepare to come to the officers aid if needed."
This retired cop has somehow reached the conclusion that it is a much more dangerous world today than it was 20 years ago, despite crime rates being at an all-time low. I'm seriously wondering where his delusion comes from, because it seems to be shared by cops all over the nation.
- pmiller2 11y ago>This retired cop has somehow reached the conclusion that it is a much more dangerous world today than it was 20 years ago, despite crime rates being at an all-time low. I'm seriously wondering where his delusion comes from, because it seems to be shared by cops all over the nation. My wild guess: the 24 hour news cycle.
- tzs 11y agoYou can't conclude he's delusional, or even wrong, from the fact that crime rates are down. What you need are stats that compare the risk to the officer now and during some time period during his career (50 to 20 years ago) in situations where use of deadly force is justified. I suspect that the necessary stats will be hard to dig up.