3 ms·
Previous discussions: * https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9976298 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9976298 * https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=99784
by 0xffffabcd 11y ago
Previous discussions:
* https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9976298 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9976298
* https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9978497 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9978497
* https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9989189 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9989189
* https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9983071 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9983071
* https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9975695 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9975695
And these are just the ones about privacy... it get old, especially since nothing has changed since the release yet.
- static_noise 11y ago> it gets old and yet it still is an urgent issue that we should not silently accept because it's "getting old" and "nothing will change".
- forthefuture 11y agoExcept when the same information is posted by 6 websites and all 6 of those articles have made the front page, you start to alienate people in the middle who understand all of the current information and are now unhappy with the one sided coverage and angry internet mob of people who already weren't using Windows.
- integraton 11y agoThose are different articles. Your comment is analogous to linking to old Docker article discussions when a new article is posted in order to try to discourage discussion of Docker in general.
- 0xffffabcd 11y agoThey are different articles about the same issue and I'm not trying to discourage discussion about it. It just gets old seeing the same thing on the front page but that's just my opinion and you don't have to agree with it.
- integraton 11y agoMy criticism isn't about your opinion. It's about your abuse of the "Previous discussion" convention.