3 ms·

Same for me. I don't think HN's particularly fast. Barely faster than rockpapershotgun.com, which has lots of images, but not much. Given that it's all pure htm

by tormeh 11y ago

Same for me. I don't think HN's particularly fast. Barely faster than rockpapershotgun.com, which has lots of images, but not much. Given that it's all pure html text, I would expect more. RPS might have better caching that's closer to me though.

aikah 11y ago
> Barely faster than rockpapershotgun.com, which has lots of images, but not much rockpapershotgun.com takes 10 seconds to load entirely and serves 1.6 MB of data. Which is OK compared to others Like Polygon and Co which serve more that 5MB on their homepage and take 20sec to load on average.