The WSI article seems pretty biased but ok, everybody is entitled to an opinion. However please note that we differ on two important things: - You seem to thi

The WSI article seems pretty biased but ok, everybody is entitled to an opinion. However please note that we differ on two important things: - You seem to think that "dead" means the heart is not working anymore. For a lot of people, me included, if my brain is dead, then I'm dead, period, even if my heart is still pumping. Consequently, you misrepresent reflex (like the legs of a frog still able to have a reflex even if it's dead) with pain, which is not. - Your "80-90% chance of death" are unsourced and seem invented, which makes me question most of your arguments. So basically you're just against deceased donation, and that's your right, but please do not mislead people with erroneous informations.