3 ms·
If you talk about cabals, there's no point in having a sensible discussion. Te existence of secret cabals is a matter of faith, and you cannot really discuss th
by EmanueleAina 11y ago
If you talk about cabals, there's no point in having a sensible discussion. Te existence of secret cabals is a matter of faith, and you cannot really discuss things of faith with reason alone.
In any case, both GNOME and Debian willingly adopted systemd. Thinking otherwise implies that GNOME and Debian developers are silly idiots: it that's the case, why bother. If it's not the case, they know what they want and nobody forcecully "pushed" anything.
- pdkl95 11y agoI was waiting for someone to reveal their ignorance by calling out "cabal". Why should anybody trust your other comments about the history of systemd when you don't know that "cabal" is Lennart Poettering's term for the systemd core developers? http://0pointer.net/blog/revisiting-how-we-put-together-linux-systems.html http://0pointer.net/blog/revisiting-how-we-put-together-linu... The systemd cabal (Kay Sievers, Harald Hoyer, Daniel Mack, Tom Gundersen, David Herrmann, and yours truly) ...
- EmanueleAina 11y agoYou either don't know the meaning of the word "irony" or you have some issues with cause→effect relations.