4 ms·
I guess 32.7 meters above sea level is reasonably uphill. I'm too lazy to calculate the approximate volume of fresh water that represents, based on the lake's
by pavement 11y ago
I guess 32.7 meters above sea level is reasonably uphill.
I'm too lazy to calculate the approximate volume of fresh water that represents, based on the lake's surface area. Pretty safe to say that the rest of the lake's volume, at and below sea level wouldn't be rendered brackish too easily.
Although, given China's penchant for environmental accidents, I wouldn't put it past them, if all that additional lake water above sea level were to get skimmed off the top by an accidental spill into the ocean.
- imglorp 11y agoMeh, China may have Three Gorges, but Western corps have plenty of environmental atrocities as well. They can pretty much operate with impunity, even on US soil. Bhopal, Prince Edward Sound, Deepwater Horizon, Niger Delta, fracking, etc etc. I think the only constant is money.
- tjradcliffe 11y agoFor comparison, the Great Lakes are about 60 m above sea level (Kingston, at the junction of Lake Ontario and the St Lawrence, is at 200 ft). Salt water inundation has not been a problem. However, invasive species (zebra mussels, for example) have been. They are fresh water species that get sucked up into ballast water in other ports (many of which are on rivers or estuaries) and pumped out in other destinations. There are procedures to avoid this (exchanging fresh-water ballast for salt water while at sea, for example) but those procedures are inevitably implemented by humans, who are certain to eventually make a mistake sufficient to cause contamination.