A litigous candidate would litigate based on the interview experience, not the rejection letter, and then access to internal notes (where the illegal discrimina

A litigous candidate would litigate based on the interview experience, not the rejection letter, and then access to internal notes (where the illegal discrimination happens) during legal discovery. The rejection letter is irrelevant. I cases that win, do you think the HR rep said "sorry blackie, we don't want your kind here"?