3 ms·
Accidents are terrible things, but I'm not exactly sure why to blame those traffic accidents on the lights instead of the drivers. First rule: drive as the driv
by imrehg 17y ago
Accidents are terrible things, but I'm not exactly sure why to blame those traffic accidents on the lights instead of the drivers.
First rule: drive as the driving conditions permit.
Had it been a power-cut or a mist (making the traffic lights similarly unusable), would people still blame the lights if someone crashes their car?
Unintended: sure. Hazard: quite possibly. Driving carefully: priceless...
- epochwolf 17y agoIf you can't see the lights you can misread the signals. I live in Green Bay, WI and I saw most of the lights along my morning route to school were covered on north/south lanes but clear on east/west. It was very very difficult to determine what light I had even using the east/west lights to rule out them having a green light. I had several close calls. Additional in Green Bay visibility was quite poor and the roads were dangerous. As for people missing the signals, I have a theory. Everyone I know determines if they have a red, yellow, or green light by looking at the color of the light. (Bear with me here.) I look at the position of the light instead of the color. I am the only person I know with normal vision that does this. From the number of people I've asked, only those with colorblindness read lights by position. I would assume this means most people look for a light to find a stoplight. Given poor visibility the lack of a visible light means people won't see the signal. Free feel to poke holes in my theory or ask me questions about my specialness with street lights.