3 ms·
Going through their website, it seems like one of the best Django tutorials I've seen, irrespective of gender.
by boxy310 11y ago
Going through their website, it seems like one of the best Django tutorials I've seen, irrespective of gender.
- keithpeter 11y agoDisclaimer: I'm a civilian as regards coding but I work as a teacher and I mentor new teachers... The pedagogic design is really good as well, see the Coaching Guide and Organiser's Manual. This is quality stuff.
- DarkTree 11y agoedit: I've been corrected, but will leave up for the argument's sake I am not trying to attack you, more so just commenting on this type of phrasing. Wouldn't it be more effective to simple say, "Going through their website, it seems like one of the best Django tutorials I've seen" -without the gender comment at all? Reading that comment, it made me think that normally you consider gender when you consider the quality of a tutorial, but in this specific incidence, it doesn't even matter. Just something minor to think about.
- vezzy-fnord 11y agoWell, the subject in question is already explicitly gendered, so making a remark like that isn't out of place.
- DarkTree 11y agoyeah that's fair actually. I guess it would only matter if he introduced it to the conversation. Well put.
- gohrt 11y agoThe article has "Girls" in the title. GP didn't drag gender into the conversation.
- GFischer 11y agoI'm a novice at both Django and Python, and their tutorial was the best one I found (not knowing their history or gender or anything). I didn't follow it through though :P I mean to learn it someday but other stuff keeps getting higher priority.