This paper does nothing to calculate any "real value" and is just a collection of biased and discredited arguments. Example of one of the arguments: "They have

This paper does nothing to calculate any "real value" and is just a collection of biased and discredited arguments. Example of one of the arguments: "They have supported the propagation of the misguided view that tax cuts are good for stimulating growth and even increasing government tax revenues. The Nobel Prize- winning economist Paul Krugman claims that this is not true in the context of the United States." That's the best they can do? Because Krugman says so? This paper is a joke.