3 ms·
The previous discussion - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9726182 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9726182 - should be read alongside this page. It had
by jackgavigan 11y ago
The previous discussion - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9726182 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9726182 - should be read alongside this page. It had a number of glaring errors, including some very bad advice about tax.