2 ms·
> isn't the "browser for doing." Is that a bad point? If you want a "browser for doing" install Firefox and 2147483647 extensions until it explodes. The fact
by Aldo_MX 11y ago
> isn't the "browser for doing."
Is that a bad point? If you want a "browser for doing" install Firefox and 2147483647 extensions until it explodes.
The fact that the default browser is extremely minimalistic is something good, users just need a "browser for browsing".
- GhotiFish 11y agoI'd have to agree that having a minimalistic browser that prevents users from getting into too much trouble is a good thing. If Microsoft decided to make Edge a purely minimal browser then expected you to get more sophisticated ones later if you needed more features, I'd actually be in favor of it. They're not going to do that. I think we all know that.
- Aldo_MX 11y agoConsidering their "Universal Windows Apps" strategy, and the history of how Chrome went from a minimalistic browser to a bloated resource hog, keeping the browser with only the essential features makes more sense in the long term.