Very much like the design tradeoffs Google chose for GWT - with the promise of reducing bugs through static, compile-time type checking. They require an ASP.NE

Very much like the design tradeoffs Google chose for GWT - with the promise of reducing bugs through static, compile-time type checking. They require an ASP.NET back-end, though, while GWT is independent of the back-end. F# is a much more interesting source language, though. This reminded me to go check up on Volta, which had promise of bringing this style of development to the .NET world. From the wikipedia page, it disappeared a little over a year ago, however.