31 ms·
No, it's entirely a violation of your ethics. You are explicitly modifying them for the express purpose of denying them income.
by s73v3r 11y ago
No, it's entirely a violation of your ethics. You are explicitly modifying them for the express purpose of denying them income.
- kinghajj 11y ago> No, it's entirely a violation of your ethics. Your ethics, perhaps. > express purpose of denying them income. No, the "express purpose" is to deny the creator's intent for how to interpret the markup, which has a side effect of denying content. Saying that the "express purpose" is to deny content isn't a fair characterization.