Glad to see someone in Washington speak some sense. But wow what a disturbingly weak "The Post's View" editorial it has in the related links: https://www.wash

Glad to see someone in Washington speak some sense. But wow what a disturbingly weak "The Post's View" editorial it has in the related links: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/compromise-needed-on-smartphone-encryption/2014/10/03/96680bf8-4a77-11e4-891d-713f052086a0_story.html https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/compromise-needed-on... It argues that people concerned about privacy "can rest assured" because keys will be protected by due process. Where to even begin, right? This editorial (talking about my link, not the OP link) has undermined my respect for the Washington Post. Is this really still their view?