3 ms·
Sweet revenge against superbugs
- pmalynin 11y agohttp://sci-hub.org/10.1038/ncomms8719 http://sci-hub.org/10.1038/ncomms8719
- marktangotango 11y agoI was like, holy cow that's a lot of contributors, but after reading the contributions section at the end, it really seemed like all those people were required to carry out a project like this. Is this typical for these types of studies?
- tstactplsignore 11y agoI'd say that number is about average for most important biology papers. There were ~5-10 life sciences papers in Nature this July with more authors than that, including this large list: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v523/n7561/full/nature14618.html http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v523/n7561/full/nature1... [1] http://www.nature.com/nature/research/biological-sciences.html?code=npg_subject_631&year=2015&month=07&page=1 http://www.nature.com/nature/research/biological-sciences.ht...
- Joky 11y agoAm I the only one lured here by the title thinking about software bug? ;)
- tiagomartins 11y agoI was also tricked by the naming, thinking it was a software bug. That's what makes sense.