4 ms·
Because it started with the CEO making a WCF service. Meaning he knew .NET and stuck with what was comfortable - just like StackOverflow's origin. Best to keep
by AdeptusAquinas 11y ago
Because it started with the CEO making a WCF service. Meaning he knew .NET and stuck with what was comfortable - just like StackOverflow's origin.
Best to keep to what you know when you are starting something risky - and there is nothing wrong with the MS stack for this sort of thing.
- vanessa98 11y agoDid you mean "a WTF service"?
- AdeptusAquinas 11y agoAlthough I havent worked with WCF for sometime (Web API is all the rage now), WCF wasnt too bad. Pretty good for making REST services, if you wanted absolute control. They streamlined a lot of the configuration needs in 3.5 and 4.
- umanwizard 11y agoNot sure if you're just joking or don't know what WCF is, but in case the latter is true: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms731082(v=vs.110).aspx https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms731082(v=vs.110)....
- vanessa98 11y agoCan it be both?
- morgante 11y ago> Because it started with the CEO making a WCF service. The CTO, not the CEO. From what I understand, you are in fact correct though. The CTO happened to be a MS guy, so the whole company had to be MS.