2 ms·
That's not a saving grace at all and I'm surprised they would try to downplay this given the potential liability. It's totally reasonable that there's someone/
by marcoperaza 11y ago
That's not a saving grace at all and I'm surprised they would try to downplay this given the potential liability. It's totally reasonable that there's someone/something you ABSOLUTELY DO NOT want to hit very close to your intended target. This exploit can make you inadvertently hit that target instead of the one that you aimed for.
- hga 11y agoIt's totally reasonable that there's someone/something you ABSOLUTELY DO NOT want to hit very close to your intended target. If that's true, you don't take the shot, with rare exceptions like hostage shield situations and war, which these guns are not suitable for. The rules exist for many reasons, including that we don't entirely trust the gun or ourselves. These guns provide additional failure modes, but the existing ones are bad enough.