>"git" or "mercurial" tells me I have an team that has some level of clue. If you're judging a team being clued in by the SCM, you're doing it wrong. There are

>"git" or "mercurial" tells me I have an team that has some level of clue. If you're judging a team being clued in by the SCM, you're doing it wrong. There are great teams that use SVN, and know-nothing teams that use git. The measure of clued-in should be how well does a technology match the organization's needs?