3 ms·
> I think you need to specify your historical period and geographical region before you can claim that a great number of people had access to productive land an
by 1stop 11y ago
> I think you need to specify your historical period and geographical region before you can claim that a great number of people had access to productive land and economic independence before industrial revolution.
Pre industrial revolution: Anywhere. You had large agricultural community (i.e farmers) typically in a Surfdom kind of relationship. So yes, they had to either pay some form of tax, or tend to land of others. But they also had land of their own, of which the could depend and survive on. "Unemployment" wasn't a thing. You also had open access to resources (hence they oil and gold rushes). These have all since been privatised.
> Who is "we" and what are the means of production that have been robbed from this person
"We" is the capitalists. Means of production is property, natural resources, etc.
> It would be very cathartic if one could just blame all the rockefellers for the economic inequality in this world but the world is not that simple.
It actually is that simple. But that's just identifying the problem. The solution to how we unwind multi-generational theft is an outright impossible one. The capitalists of today, think they rightfully own their capital, as it wasn't them personally who stole it.
> I think you are being silly.
Ad-hominem, but you are entitled to that way of thinking. It is difficult when people challenge our core beliefs, I can understand the position.
> Nowadays to give people a little more independence in developed economies would only require a sustainable model of basic income which is more of a political hassle rather than anything since most developed countries already have extensive systems of income transfer.
Would "only require", and given it's such an obvious thing to adopt, why hasn't it been? I would argue: "Because capitalists don't want it, and they are the ones in control". There are extensive systems of income transfer from the middle class. But Warren Buffet made it clear that Capitalists are largely unaffected by such measures (this is true the world over, not just the US).
- fsloth 11y agoSorry about the ad-hominem in the previous post, it was a poor choice of words. I did not claim that capitalism was 'fair', nor that the rich elites did not have a political leverage to further their personal well being. But it's not slavery. Calling things "Unfair" would be a good start, and then figuring out the parameters of the solution space. I.e. if the status quo is "unfair", then what would "fair" look like. It certainly does feel unfair that while the productivity has skyrocketed people still need to work 40 hour weeks to provide for housing, food and healthcare. But I don't think the answer to "fair" is in rural pre-industrial societies. I said: "I think you need to specify your historical period and geographical region before you can claim that a great number of people had access to productive land and economic independence before industrial revolution." To which you replied: "Pre industrial revolution: Anywhere." "Anywhere" would imply all members of pre-industrial agricultural communities thrived in sovereign bliss. This is quite far from the truth. Russia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serfdom_in_Russia#Transition_to_full_serfdom https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serfdom_in_Russia#Transition_t... Ireland: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Famine_%28Ireland%29#Landlords_and_tenants https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Famine_%28Ireland%29#Lan...