3 ms·

I don't understand what kind of AI/robotics we are talking about here: - weak non-self-replicating; - weak self-replicating; - strong. Besides, maybe it's a

• coldtea 11y ago
  >Besides, maybe it's an egoistic point of view. Many species have perished while humanity established itself. Does it really matter if we go extinct, if the result is going to be a superior species? In general, not wanting to die or go extinct is not considered an "egoistic point of view". Or, let's put it this way, from all the egoistic points of view, it's the most excusable. Why the duck should we care for a "superior species" (and a mchanical one at that)? Would you let a "superior country" fuck up your own country? Would you let a "superior person" kill your family and use your resources to sustain themselves? Is it OK to extinct dolphins and lions, since we are a "superior species"? Even more so since "superior" in this context has nothing to do with "morally better" but just means "more powerful" and "more fit to overtake others and survive".