3 ms·
What a crock of shit. As an Aussie, I am disgusted that this is seen as a viable solution for an advanced democracy. It riles me on all sorts of censorship lev
by JacobAldridge 17y ago
What a crock of shit.
As an Aussie, I am disgusted that this is seen as a viable solution for an advanced democracy. It riles me on all sorts of censorship levels, even before it pisses me off as a taxpayer that a system so readily circumvented will be the subject of public spending.
I honestly thought the 'trial' was going to be used to demonstrate what a pathetic and short-minded idea this was, so that it could be quietly swept under the carpet. Instead, I can only assume the trial was always intended to arrive at a foregone conclusion.
Extreme conservatives - who won't ever support the current Labor government - must be delighted. And there will be a whole swathe of middle-class, swing-voting families relieved that their children will be protected, until they discover their 12 year old surfing the net around the filter just to see what sites like donkeyporn.com and ruddisacommunist.org (sites I probably made up) are all about. At that point they'll be wondering why the government couldn't spend $125.8 million over four years on reducing the massive deficit or stimulating jobs.
Edit: The Lord giveth and the Lord taketh away - the government has also communicated today that they plan to open discussion for an R Rating on video games - http://www.news.com.au/technology/australians-get-their-say-on-video-game-ratings/story-e6frfro0-1225810592521 http://www.news.com.au/technology/australians-get-their-say-...
I doubt it's a timing coincidence.
- adsyoung 17y agoAside from the censorship issues (I know which end of that spectrum Senator Conroy sits and I can't imagine him moving), I cannot believe they are going ahead with a plan that they have been told repeatedly will fail. From the tv debate held here a while back, it all seems to be based on the ridiculous agrument that we have to try something...anything...for the children's sake. No, you really don't have to try things we know will fail. That's just pure idiocy.
- pmorici 17y agoThey should just hand out free parental control software and let the parents decide what to do.
- andrewtj 17y agoFor those not aware the previous government did precisely this via http://www.netalert.gov.au http://www.netalert.gov.au
- camccann 17y agoit all seems to be based on the ridiculous agrument that we have to try something...anything...for the children's sake. This seems to be an instance of a type of reasoning known as the Politician's Syllogism: Premise: Something must be done. Premise: This is something. Conclusion: We must do this.
- mdemare 17y agoThis quote is from "Yes Minister": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vidzkYnaf6Y http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vidzkYnaf6Y