> I pretty clearly said "job performance is #1" and you are insisting otherwise. No, I'm not. I was talking about the part of your complaint where you were say

> I pretty clearly said "job performance is #1" and you are insisting otherwise. No, I'm not. I was talking about the part of your complaint where you were saying that police shouldn't particularly care about their own safety. > you are taking my response out of context if you are applying it to anything other than the population of the police in the article. The part of your comment I responded to was directly after a quote from a comment talking about the issue in general. Similarly, your comment was also general - after all, if you were specifically talking about the event in the article, it would have been in past tense. Anyway, arguing about arguing now. Time to sign off.