4 ms·
Fair enough, huh :) Actually, it's mentioned because we wanted to note it somehow - it's always better to have this set up on your own server
by RomanPushkin 11y ago
Fair enough, huh :) Actually, it's mentioned because we wanted to note it somehow - it's always better to have this set up on your own server
- kodablah 11y agoI haven't looked deeply into this implementation, but with OTR's forward secrecy and 3.1+ authentication, is that not enough to defeat even the server being compromised? (meaning, at least you would know it was compromised assuming you trusted the actor on the other end)
- Bogdanovich 11y agoIf server is compromised, web app source code would probably change to something else.