4 ms·
I don't know if what you're talking about is software, or a physical invention. Based on the word 'technology' though, I'll assume it's software for a moment.
by bosdev 11y ago
I don't know if what you're talking about is software, or a physical invention. Based on the word 'technology' though, I'll assume it's software for a moment. I think the attitude of much of the tech community is that patents shouldn't generally be applied to software in general. Many established companies have agreed to only use patents defensively, and most of the traffic that patents get these days are rebukes against 'patent trolls' who spend time acquiring patents rather than actually delivering value to anyone.
I would encourage you to think about starting a business around your tech, rather than worrying too much about legally defending it. Starting a successful company requires so many good decisions that it's much more defensible than most people think. If you were the first one to think of this idea, you'll also be the first to think of many of the ways it can be used to deliver value.
- tixocloud 11y agoThanks for the response. Your assumption is correct in that I'm talking about software. I agree with your comments and it definitely makes sense. My only worry is that investors will want to see that the technology is protectable before investing with their main fear being that the technology can be duplicated once people get insight into the methodology. It seems like we have a slightly more conservative investor environment here in Canada.