Besides that, the other most significant thing was the lack of open API for it. They fail to understand that people at the time wanted to consume it in their o

Besides that, the other most significant thing was the lack of open API for it. They fail to understand that people at the time wanted to consume it in their own way (and still do, to some extent). At the time G+ came to exist people loved it. They wanted the conversations like that. They liked the circles idea (at the time Twitter didn't have lists or any such concept), and it's still better than what the other social media services have. But to use it you only had the choice of the G+ app, or the website, which wasn't how people were consuming social media. They were using things like TweetDeck to connect to multiple services so that they could consume their social media stream, especially businesses. https://plus.google.com/+RipRowan/posts/eVeouesvaVX https://plus.google.com/+RipRowan/posts/eVeouesvaVX (Steve Yegge's rant still seems to apply 3 years later)