4 ms·

I think chc has a good point. The G+ debacle was greedy, annoying, and user-hostile, but _evil_? Really? The launch of Buzz was definitely somewhere on the tho

I think chc has a good point. The G+ debacle was greedy, annoying, and user-hostile, but _evil_? Really? The launch of Buzz was definitely somewhere on the thoughtless-evil spectrum, though. A major breach of trust, at the very least.

function_seven 11y ago
> The G+ debacle was greedy, annoying, and user-hostile, but _evil_? Really? If it was greedy, annoying, and user-hostile, then yes--according to the context of Google's motto[1]--it could be considered evil. "Evil" in this case doesn't mean the same thing it does when we're talking about rapists, murderers, and Dow Chemical. [1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don%27t_be_evil https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don%27t_be_evil